AIDS Care - Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of AIDS/HIV
Volume 27, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 512-519

Sexual relationship power and intimate partner violence among sex workers with non-commercial intimate partners in a Canadian setting (Article)

Muldoon K.A. , Deering K.N. , Feng C.X. , Shoveller J.A. , Shannon K.*
  • a School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Gender and Sexual Health Initiative, British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  • b Gender and Sexual Health Initiative, British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  • c Gender and Sexual Health Initiative, British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  • d School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  • e School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Gender and Sexual Health Initiative, British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Abstract

There is little information on the private lives of women engaged in sex work, particularly how power dynamics within intimate relationships may affect intimate partner violence (IPV). Using baseline data of sex workers enrolled in a longitudinal cohort, "An Evaluation of Sex Workers' Health Access" (AESHA), the present study examined the association between sexual relationship power and IPV among sex workers in non-commercial partnerships in Vancouver, Canada. Pulweritz's Sexual Relationship Power Scale (SRPS) and The World Health Organization (WHO) Intimate Partner Violence against Women Scale (Version9.9) were used. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression techniques were used to investigate the potential confounding effect of sexual relationship power on IPV among sex workers. Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. Of 510 sex workers, 257 (50.4%) reported having an non-commercial intimate partner and were included in this analysis. In the past 6 months, 84 (32.7%) sex workers reported IPV (physical, sexual or emotional). The median age was 32 years, 39.3% were of Aboriginal ancestry, and 27.6% were migrants. After controlling for known confounders (e.g., age, Aboriginal ancestry, migrant status, childhood trauma, non-injection drug use), low relationship power was independently associated with 4.19 increased odds (95% CI: 1.93-9.10) and medium relationship power was associated 1.95 increased odds (95% CI: 0.89-4.25) of IPV. This analysis highlights how reduced control over sexual-decision making is plays a critical role in IPV among sex workers, and calls for innovation and inclusive programming tailored to sex workers and their noncommercial intimate partnerships. © 2014 Taylor & Francis.

Author Keywords

Sex work Sexual decision-making Sexual relationship power Intimate partner violence

Index Keywords

rating scale longitudinal study Interpersonal Relations management sexual behavior indigenous people human epidemiology sexuality middle aged sex difference injury violence statistics and numerical data priority journal social support emotional abuse sex worker Spouse Abuse human relation physical abuse Cross-Sectional Studies Surveys and Questionnaires cross-sectional study migrant psychology Humans Canada female Socioeconomic Factors risk factor Risk Factors sexual relationship power scale socioeconomics sexual relationship power intimate partner violence aginst women scale questionnaire prostitution prevention and control sexual abuse childhood trauma women's health Article Canadian major clinical study partner violence adult drug abuse sexual intercourse Sex Factors cohort analysis world health organization Sex Workers decision making policy making

Link
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84923109064&doi=10.1080%2f09540121.2014.978732&partnerID=40&md5=3dc9d247438014c7e069550d483aa50e

DOI: 10.1080/09540121.2014.978732
ISSN: 09540121
Cited by: 15
Original Language: English