BMC Public Health
Volume 15, Issue 1, 2015

The validity of self-reported cancer screening history and the role of social disadvantage in Ontario, Canada (Article) (Open Access)

Lofters A.* , Vahabi M. , Glazier R.H.
  • a St. Michael's Hospital Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, Centre for Research on Inner City Health, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada
  • b Centre for Research on Inner City Health, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada, Faculty of Community Services, Daphne Cockwell School of Nursing, Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada
  • c St. Michael's Hospital Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, Centre for Research on Inner City Health, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada

Abstract

Background: Self-report may not be an accurate method of determining cervical, breast and colorectal cancer screening rates due to recall, acquiescence and social desirability biases, particularly for certain sociodemographic groups. Therefore, the aims of this study were to determine the validity of self-report of cancer screening in Ontario, Canada, both for people in the general population and for socially disadvantaged groups based on immigrant status, ethnicity, education, income, language ability, self-rated health, employment status, age category (for cervical cancer screening), and gender (for fecal occult blood testing). Methods: We linked multiple data sources for this study, including the Canadian Community Health Survey and provincial-level health databases. Using administrative data as our gold standard, we calculated validity measures for self-report (i.e. sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, positive and negative predictive values), calculated report-to-record ratios, and conducted a multivariable regression analysis to determine which characteristics were independently associated with over-reporting of screening. Results: Specificity was less than 70% overall and for all subgroups for cervical and breast cancer screening, and sensitivity was lower than 80% overall and for all subgroups for fecal occult blood testing FOBT. Report-to-record ratios were persistently significantly greater than 1 across all cancer screening types, highest for the FOBT group: 1.246 [1.189-1.306]. Regression analyses showed no consistent patterns, but sociodemographic characteristics were associated with over-reporting for each screening type. Conclusions: We have found that in Ontario, as in other jurisdictions, there is a pervasive tendency for people to over-report their cancer screening histories. Sociodemographic status also appears to influence over-reporting. Public health practitioners and policymakers need to be aware of the limitations of self-report and adjust their methods and interpretations accordingly. © 2015 Lofters et al.

Author Keywords

Self-report Validity Socioeconomic status Cancer screening

Index Keywords

self disclosure mass screening validation study human Self Report middle aged statistics and numerical data Colorectal Neoplasms Early Detection of Cancer procedures Humans male Canada female sensitivity and specificity Ontario adult patient participation Uterine Cervical Neoplasms early diagnosis

Link
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84924244326&doi=10.1186%2fs12889-015-1441-y&partnerID=40&md5=366d14adf1aea2ad45151788064c80c8

DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-1441-y
ISSN: 14712458
Cited by: 29
Original Language: English