Health researchers may have a strategic role to play in confronting the predicament of refugee detainees because they can lend their analytic skills and authority to document the personal cost and impact of this practice. The justification for such 'subversive' research comes from the discrepancy between the sources of legitimacy and legality for government action. The practice of detention may be legal but illegitimate, judged against the standards of international human rights. Hence, research to explore the consequences of this policy is both morally and politically legitimate. Morally, it reflects a commitment to uncover and oppose unjustified violence against others; politically, it represents an attempt to identify and challenge abuses of power by the state. However, doing research without official approval or with the use of deception raises concerns for the safety of detainees as vulnerable research subjects as well as the credibility of researchers and the research enterprise. Researchers also may face sanctions that will limit their future effectiveness. An international network of researchers working on issues of human rights and the health of asylum seekers can provide an institutional basis to support work that challenges local practices.

[No Keywords available]

Dissent and Disputes refugee Australia professional standard conflict human War and Human Rights Abuses ethics personnel Refugees Research Personnel research ethics Ethics, Research policy Biomedical and Behavioral Research Human Rights Abuses Professional Role recumbency human rights abuse Deception Humans Article Behavioral research migration legal aspect politics Emigration and Immigration public policy