Medical Care
Volume 41, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 447-457

Use of the SF-36 in low-income Chinese American primary care patients (Article)

Lubetkin E.I.* , Jia H. , Gold M.R.
  • a Department of Community Health and Social Medicine, CUNY Medical School, New York, NY, United States, Department of Community Health and Social Medicine, CUNY Medical School, 138th Street and Convent Avenue, New York, NY 10031, United States
  • b Department of Community Health and Social Medicine, CUNY Medical School, New York, NY, United States
  • c Department of Community Health and Social Medicine, CUNY Medical School, New York, NY, United States

Abstract

BACKGROUND. Measures of health status have been increasingly utilized but most research in the United States has been conducted on middle-class, English-speaking white persons. Although Asians reportedly often have a better health status than white persons, previously surveyed samples may not be representative of low-income non-English-speaking Asian immigrant populations. MATERIALS AND METHODS. This cross-sectional study surveyed a convenience sample of low-income Chinese patients attending a community health center in Chinatown (New York City). We sought to evaluate the known-groups validity of self-administered Chinese and English versions of the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and to determine if scores differed from a community-based sample of Chinese Americans and the United States general population. RESULTS. Eight hundred fifty-six persons were approached and data were obtained from 523 participants (61%); 90% completed the questionnaire in Chinese and 74% earned less than $15,000. Known-group comparisons based upon differences in age, gender, and number of medical problems yielded support for the validity of the SF-36 in this sample. The sample's SF-36 subscale scores were lower than scores from the community-based sample of Chinese Americans and tended to be lower than scores from the United States general population. Mean scores were lowest for persons reporting depression, anxiety, or an emotional problem. CONCLUSIONS. The SF-36 demonstrated known-groups validity in this low-income Chinese sample. Collecting data in the primary care setting enables both a better understanding of the relative burden of disease in low-income Chinese and targeted program planning for preventive interventions. © 2003 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Author Keywords

Health status Primary care Asian Americans Survey

Index Keywords

China regression analysis poverty sex ratio human validation study middle aged statistics comparative study health status Aged ethnology Cross-Sectional Studies quality of life United States cross-sectional study Humans Adolescent Asian Americans male Asian American female Aged, 80 and over Socioeconomic Factors cost of illness socioeconomics questionnaire Health Status Indicators Article Questionnaires adult New York City Sex Distribution age distribution standard Reference Values primary health care reference value health survey

Link
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85047695219&doi=10.1097%2f01.MLR.0000053225.82437.41&partnerID=40&md5=acebc5ac7a7c1818cef2bd2e310afdb4

DOI: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000053225.82437.41
ISSN: 00257079
Cited by: 14
Original Language: English