PLoS ONE
Volume 14, Issue 11, 2019

Evaluating the cross-cultural validity of the Dutch version of the Social Exclusion Index for Health Surveys (SEI-HS): A mixed methods study (Article) (Open Access)

Van Bergen A.P.L.* , Van Loon A. , De Wit M.A.S. , Hoff S.J.M. , Wolf J.R.L.M. , Van Hemert A.M.
  • a Staff Department, Public Health Service Hollands Midden, Leiden, Netherlands, Department of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
  • b Department of Epidemiology, Health Promotion and Care Innovation, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • c Department of Epidemiology, Health Promotion and Care Innovation, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • d Department of Income and Social Security, Netherlands Institute of Social Research, SCP, The Hague, Netherlands
  • e Impuls, Netherlands Center for Social Care Research, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
  • f Department of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands

Abstract

Background The recently developed Social Exclusion Index for Health Surveys (SEI-HS) revealed particularly strong social exclusion in non-Western immigrant groups compared to the native Dutch population. To qualify such results, cross-cultural validation of the SEI-HS in non-Western immigrant groups is called for. Methods A sequential explanatory mixed methods design was used, employing quantitative data from the Netherlands Public Health Monitor along with qualitative interviews. Data from 1,803 adults aged 19 years or older of Surinamese, 1,009 of Moroccan and 1,164 of Turkish background and 19,318 native Dutch living in the four largest cities in the Netherlands were used to test the factorial structure of the SEI-HS and differential item functioning across immigrant groups. Additionally, 52 respondents with a high score on the SEI-HS and from different background were interviewed on the item content of the SEI-HS and subjective feelings of exclusion. For each SEI-HS item the semantic, conceptual and contextual connotations were coded and compared between the immigrant groups and native Dutch. Results High levels of social exclusion were found in 20.0% of the urban population of Surinamese origin, 20.9% of Moroccan, 28.7% of Turkish and 4.2% of native Dutch origin. The 4-factor structure of the SEI-HS was confirmed in all three immigrant groups. None of the items demonstrated substantial differential item functioning in relation to immigration background. The interviews uncovered some methodological shortcomings, but these did not substantially impact the observed excess of social exclusion in immigrant groups. Conclusions The present study provides evidence in support of the validity of the SEI-HS in adults of Surinamese, Moroccan and Turkish background and confirms the major social exclusion of these immigrant groups in the main cities in the Netherlands. Policy measures to enhance social inclusion and reduce exclusion are urgently needed. © 2019 van Bergen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Author Keywords

[No Keywords available]

Index Keywords

male urban population Netherlands female human major clinical study immigrant validity social exclusion quantitative analysis Article interview Young Adult immigration adult human experiment health survey

Link
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85074509460&doi=10.1371%2fjournal.pone.0224687&partnerID=40&md5=6b22b28a525e9561982ba72c33afa294

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224687
ISSN: 19326203
Original Language: English