Critical Social Policy
Volume 36, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 225-245

Should irregular migrants have the right to healthcare? Lessons learnt from the Spanish case (Article)

Boso À.* , Vancea M.
  • a Universidad de la Frontera, Temuco, Chile
  • b Universidad de la Frontera, Temuco, Chile

Abstract

This article critically evaluates the Royal Decree-Law 16/2012, which regulates migrants’ access to public healthcare services in Spain. In particular, it examines the political rationale behind the restriction of migrants’ access to primary and specialised healthcare services. We depart from the right to health as it is defined in the Spanish and international legislations to deconstruct three arguments used by the Popular Party government – the administrative status, high health costs and possible pull effect of welfare policies – to legitimise irregular migrants’ exclusion from full medical coverage. We contend that the Royal Decree-Law 16/2012 not only fails to meet the requirements of a human rights based approach but it may also be economically inefficient in the medium to long term. © 2016, © The Author(s) 2016.

Author Keywords

the right to health fundamental human rights Economic crisis Neoliberalism Irregular migrants

Index Keywords

government Spain social exclusion accessibility welfare welfare provision international law health services neoliberalism service provision human rights human primary health care migrant immigrant population

Link
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84961575524&doi=10.1177%2f0261018315624174&partnerID=40&md5=2db506b3df2b9e76c927de5a053d68ee

DOI: 10.1177/0261018315624174
ISSN: 02610183
Cited by: 1
Original Language: English