Public Health
Volume 121, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 822-827

Tuberculosis screening of asylum seekers: 1 years' experience at the Dover Induction Centres (Article)

Harling R.* , Pearce M. , Chandrakumar M. , Mueller K. , Hayward A.
  • a Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Department of Primary Care and Population Science, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill St., London, NW3 2PF, United Kingdom
  • b Kent Health Protection Unit, Preston Hall, Aylesford, Kent ME20 7NJ, United Kingdom
  • c Kent Health Protection Unit, Preston Hall, Aylesford, Kent ME20 7NJ, United Kingdom
  • d Kent Health Protection Unit, Preston Hall, Aylesford, Kent ME20 7NJ, United Kingdom
  • e Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Department of Primary Care and Population Science, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill St., London, NW3 2PF, United Kingdom

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the uptake and outcomes of a service for tuberculosis screening of asylum seekers. Study design: Descriptive study. Methods: A tuberculosis screening service was established at the Dover Induction Centres for all asylum seekers entering the UK through ports in Kent. This study describes the uptake and completion of tuberculosis screening, the results of tuberculin skin testing and follow-up, and the cost of the service during its first year. Results: In 1 year, 8258 asylum seekers were screened: 94% of 8799 who were eligible. A total of 2.2% of those with completed screens were positive (on the basis of symptoms requiring further investigation or positive Heaf reaction). Eleven cases of active respiratory disease were diagnosed on the basis of symptoms, Heaf reaction plus chest X-ray, or both; three were confirmed microbiologically. One-quarter of Heaf tests were not read because of the rapid dispersal of asylum seekers. The follow-up of those requiring further investigations at their destinations was largely unknown. The service cost was £350 000. Conclusions: Induction centre tuberculosis screening services for asylum seekers can achieve a high uptake, but their cost-effectiveness is questionable, particularly where the yield of active disease is low. Tuberculin skin testing is not an ideal screening procedure in this setting because it may be uncompleted and the benefit of detecting latent infections is uncertain. © 2007 The Royal Institute of Public Health.

Author Keywords

Screening tuberculosis New entrants

Index Keywords

Eurasia Kent mass screening respiratory disease Europe infectious disease follow up human Refugees controlled study Mycobacterium tuberculosis respiratory tract disease Western Europe BCG vaccine screening test Great Britain asylum seeker health care cost Humans male Emigrants and Immigrants England female tuberculosis symptom health services Article major clinical study tuberculin test adult microbiological examination United Kingdom thorax radiography outcome assessment Emigration and Immigration Patient Acceptance of Health Care Health Policy health care facility attitude to health Dover cost effectiveness analysis tuberculin

Link
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-35348893130&doi=10.1016%2fj.puhe.2007.02.019&partnerID=40&md5=07929d8c372aa2de0d2ccde9c9004d4c

DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2007.02.019
ISSN: 00333506
Cited by: 11
Original Language: English