Harefuah
Volume 146, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 584-588
Attitudes of immigrants from the former Soviet Union towards complementary medicine (Article)
Ben-Arye E.* ,
Shturman E. ,
Klein A. ,
Frenkel M.
-
a
Department of Family Medicine, Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel, Clalit Health Services, Haifa and Western Galilee District, Israel
-
b
Department of Family Medicine, Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel, Clalit Health Services, Haifa and Western Galilee District, Israel
-
c
Medicollege, International Center, College of Natural Complementary Medicine, Haifa, Israel
-
d
Department of Family Medicine, Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel, Clalit Health Services, Haifa and Western Galilee District, Israel, CAM Education Project, Department of Family Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States
Abstract
Background: The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in primary care in Israel is growing. Limited data is available on the influence of immigration and cross-cultural health-beliefs concerning CAM use. Objectives: This study explores the perspectives toward CAM of immigrants who came to Israel since 1990 from the former Soviet Union. Research Design and Methods: Questionnaires were administered to a random sample of patients attending an urban academic primary care clinic located in Northern Israel. Results: Out of 1146 participants in this study, 106 were immigrants from the former Soviet-Union. No statistical significance was found in the extent of CAM use in the last year among immigrants (63%) and non-immigrants (54%). Immigrants using CAM reported significantly less in reference to CAM practitioners and more use of herbal products. They also more significantly supported the idea of including an herbal therapist in the clinical staff at the medical center. Both groups expected their family physician to refer them to CAM, but immigrants had significantly higher expectations of their physician to provide CAM. Both groups anticipated an active role for their family physician in a future scenario of integrative care at the clinic. Conclusions: The use of CAM in primary care can be interpreted in a cross-cultural perspective. Patients who emigrated from the former USSR have unique perspectives toward CAM. The authors propose practical suggestions for primary care clinicians concerning anamnesis of immigrants regarding CAM. They also suggest health administrators take into account cross-cultural diversity when planning integration of CAM in primary care.
Author Keywords
Index Keywords
Link
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-34848883110&partnerID=40&md5=0a875bd271cb9357b9e8c78cfdd57dc5
ISSN: 00177768
Cited by: 4
Original Language: Hebrew