Planning Theory and Practice
Volume 19, Issue 4, 2018, Pages 581-615
Strengthening Planning’s Effectiveness in a Hyper-Polarized World/Responding to the Conservative Common Sense of Opposition to Planning and Development in England/The Limits to Negotiation and the Promise of Refusal/Planning Contexts in a Hyper-Polarized World/A Right to Sanctuary: Supporting Immigrant Communities in an Era of Extreme Precarity/Planning and Climate Change: Opportunities and Challenges in a Politically Contested Environment/Speaking with the Middle 40% to Bridge the Political Divide for Mutual Gains in Planning Agreements (Article) (Open Access)
Trapenberg Frick K.* ,
Myers D. ,
Inch A. ,
Dorries H. ,
Thomas J.M. ,
Lung-Amam W.S. ,
Sandoval G.F. ,
Foss A.W.
-
a
Department of City and Regional Planning, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States
-
b
Sol Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
-
c
Department of Urban Studies and Planning, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
-
d
Indigenous Policy and Administration Program, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada
-
e
Urban and Regional Planning Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
-
f
Urban Studies and Planning Program, the National Center for Smart Growth Research and Education, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States
-
g
Department of Planning, Public Policy, and Management, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States
-
h
College of Architecture, Planning and Public Affairs, University of Texas at ArlingtonTX, United States
Abstract
[No abstract available]
Author Keywords
[No Keywords available]
Index Keywords
Link
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85055468602&doi=10.1080%2f14649357.2018.1507884&partnerID=40&md5=d554ef79d3730b0377cb0c65f6dae3cc
DOI: 10.1080/14649357.2018.1507884
ISSN: 14649357
Cited by: 2
Original Language: English