Cancer
Volume 124, 2018, Pages 1599-1606

Perspectives of Chinese American smoker and nonsmoker household pairs about the creating smokefree living together program (Article)

Saw A.* , Paterniti D.A. , Fung L.-C. , Tsoh J.Y. , Tong E.K.
  • a Department of Psychology, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, United States
  • b Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, Davis Medical Center, University of California, Sacramento, CA, United States, Department of Sociology, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, CA, United States
  • c Chinatown Public Health Center, San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, CA, United States
  • d Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
  • e Department of Internal Medicine, Davis Medical Center, University of California, Sacramento, CA, United States

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chinese men smoke at high rates, and this puts household members at risk for tobacco-related diseases. Culturally responsive interventions that provide education and support are needed to promote smokefree living and reduce smoke exposure, particularly for US immigrants who experience changes in smokefree social norms. This qualitative study examines perspectives of Chinese American smoker and nonsmoker household pairs in the Creating Smokefree Living Together program. METHODS: Four focus groups were conducted with 30 Chinese American participants (15 smokers and 15 nonsmokers) who, in household pairs, completed smokefree education interventions of either brief or moderate intensity. Nearly three-quarters of the smokers continued to smoke after the intervention at the time of focus group participation. All smokers were male, and most household nonsmokers were female spouses. All participants had limited English proficiency. Focus group meetings were recorded, and the recordings were translated and transcribed. Transcripts and field notes were thematically analyzed. RESULTS: The following themes, shared by smokers and nonsmokers across interventions, were identified: 1) there was a preference for dyadic and group interventions because of the support offered, 2) increased knowledge of the health harms of smoke exposure within a pair improved the nonsmoker's support for smokefree living, 3) learning communication strategies improved household relationships and assertiveness for smokefree environments, 4) biochemical feedback was useful but had short-term effects, and 5) project magnets provided cues to action. CONCLUSIONS: Involving household partners is critical to smokefree interventions. Simple reminders at home appear to be more powerful than personal biochemical feedback of smoke exposure for sustaining motivation and engagement in ongoing behavioral changes within the household. Cancer 2018;124:1599-606. © 2018 American Cancer Society. © 2018 American Cancer Society

Author Keywords

Chinese Tobacco use intervention Secondhand smoke household

Index Keywords

household home English (language) Follow-Up Studies motivation interpersonal communication human Health Behavior follow up middle aged smoking ban priority journal smoking prevention Aged San Francisco prognosis procedures qualitative research Humans psychology smoking California Asian Americans male Asian American female Aged, 80 and over tobacco dependence very elderly Tobacco Use Disorder Non-Smokers clinical article Smokers community participation Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Article Early Intervention (Education) adult health education health hazard attitude to health early childhood intervention exposure behavior change

Link
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85044447966&doi=10.1002%2fcncr.31220&partnerID=40&md5=44af81418ca10172a1f9b5f004424aaf

DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31220
ISSN: 0008543X
Cited by: 2
Original Language: English