Journal of Travel Medicine
Volume 13, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 145-152
Illness in returned travelers and immigrants/refugees: The 6-year experience of two Australian infectious diseases units (Article) (Open Access)
O'Brien D.P.* ,
Leder K. ,
Matchett E. ,
Brown G.V. ,
Torresi J.
-
a
Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Centre for Clinical Research Excellence, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia, Geelong Infectious Diseases Service, Geelong Hospital, Vic., Australia, Geelong Infectious Diseases Unit, 68 Myers Street, Geelong, Vic. 3220, Australia
-
b
Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Centre for Clinical Research Excellence, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Vic., Australia
-
c
Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Centre for Clinical Research Excellence, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia
-
d
Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Centre for Clinical Research Excellence, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia, Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Vic., Australia
-
e
Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Centre for Clinical Research Excellence, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia, Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Vic., Australia
Abstract
Background. Data comparing returned travelers and immigrants/refugees managed in a hospital setting is lacking. Methods. We prospectively collected data on 1,106 patients with an illness likely acquired overseas who presented to two hospital-based Australian infectious diseases units over a 6-year period. Results. Eighty-three percent of patients were travelers and 17% immigrants/refugees. In travelers, malaria (19%), gastroenteritis/diarrhea (15%), and upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) (7%) were the most common diagnoses. When compared with immigrants/refugees, travelers were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with gastroenteritis/diarrhea [odds ratio (OR) 8], malaria (OR 7), pneumonia (OR 6), URTI (OR 3), skin infection, dengue fever, typhoid/paratyphoid fever, influenza, and rickettsial disease. They were significantly less likely to be diagnosed with leprosy (OR 0.03), chronic hepatitis (OR 0.04), tuberculosis (OR 0.05), schistosomiasis (OR 0.3), and helminthic infection (OR 0.3). In addition, travelers were more likely to present within 1 month of entry into Australia (OR 96), and have fever (OR 8), skin (OR 6), gastrointestinal (OR 5), or neurological symptoms (OR 5) but were less likely to be asymptomatic (OR 0.1) or have anaemia (OR 0.4) or eosinophilia (OR 0.3). Diseases in travelers were more likely to have been acquired via a vector (OR 13) or food and water (OR 4), and less likely to have been acquired via the respiratory (OR 0.2) or skin (OR 0.6) routes. We also found that travel destination and classification of traveler can significantly influence the likelihood of a specific diagnosis in travelers. Six percent of travelers developed a potentially vaccine-preventable disease, with failure to vaccinate occurring in 31% of these cases in the pretravel medical consultation. Conclusions. There are important differences in the spectrum of illness, clinical features, and mode of disease transmission between returned travelers and immigrants/refugees presenting to hospital-based Australian infectious diseases units with an illness acquired overseas. © 2006 International Society of Travel Medicine.
Author Keywords
[No Keywords available]
Index Keywords
Link
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-33646688680&doi=10.1111%2fj.1708-8305.2006.00033.x&partnerID=40&md5=901788294d7f9a2406e2b346bf19d94f
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8305.2006.00033.x
ISSN: 11951982
Cited by: 64
Original Language: English