Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Volume 41, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 248-250

Cross-cultural use of the predetermined scale cutoff points in refugee mental health research (Article)

Ichikawa M.* , Nakahara S. , Wakai S.
  • a Dept. of Community Health, School of International Health Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bukyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
  • b Dept. of Community Health, School of International Health Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bukyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
  • c Dept. of Community Health, School of International Health Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bukyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan

Abstract

Background: Cross-cultural use of the cutoff points determined in Indo-Chinese refugees of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25 (HSCL-25) and the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire (HTQ) is common in refugee mental health research but it might have caused misclassifications. Methods: We assessed the validity of the predetermined cutoff points in identifying depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) cases among Afghan refugees, with the algorithm method as a gold standard. We estimated the prevalence of depression and PTSD, using the HSCL-25 and the HTQ with the cutoff points and the algorithm method, and calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the cutoff points. Results: Nine in ten PTSD cases/non-cases were correctly identified as cases/non-cases, and nine in ten respondents classified as PTSD cases/ non-cases were actually cases/non-cases. In contrast, only one in three non-depression cases was correctly identified as a non-case, and three in five respondents who were classified as depression cases was actually a case. The prevalence of depression was estimated to be 86% with the cutoff points and 53% with the algorithm method, and that of PTSD 46% and 44%, respectively. Conclusions: The cutoff point approach might have low specificity and positive predictive value particularly for depression in our study. Cross-cultural use of the scale cutoff points determined in one cultural group to another needs to be reconsidered. © Steinkopff Verlag Darmstadt 2006.

Author Keywords

Validity Cross-cultural comparison Refugee Psychiatric status rating scales

Index Keywords

symptomatology disease classification Afghanistan depression refugee methodology mental health human Refugees validation process health status diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders algorithm Humans Cross-Cultural Comparison Japan prediction Psychiatric Status Rating Scales questionnaire cultural factor prevalence sensitivity and specificity Article major clinical study Predictive Value of Tests posttraumatic stress disorder Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic gold standard Reference Values health survey

Link
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-33645223706&doi=10.1007%2fs00127-005-0016-2&partnerID=40&md5=16c5ad9a0afbac18c6a16b97b756328e

DOI: 10.1007/s00127-005-0016-2
ISSN: 09337954
Cited by: 30
Original Language: English