Journal of Public Health
Volume 27, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 192-195
Screening of new entrants for tuberculosis: Responses to port notifications (Article) (Open Access)
Hogan H.* ,
Coker R. ,
Gordon A. ,
Meltzer M. ,
Pickles H.
-
a
North East London Strategic Health Authority, Aneurin Bevan House, 81 Commercial Road, London E1 1RD, United Kingdom
-
b
ECOHOST, Department of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom
-
c
Hillingdon PCT, Kirk House, 97 High Street, Yiewsley, Middlesex UB7 7HJ, United Kingdom
-
d
North West London Health Protection Unit, Hillingdon PCT, Kirk House, 97 High Street, Yiewsley, Middlesex UB7 7HJ, United Kingdom
-
e
Hillingdon PCT, Kirk House, 97 High Street, Yiewsley, Middlesex UB7 7HJ, United Kingdom, Department of Public Health, United Kingdom
Abstract
Background: Tuberculosis in England and Wales is associated with recently arrived immigrants. Screening new entrants for tuberculosis has received considerable attention recently. Despite several calls to reorganize screening processes for new entrants because of perceived ineffectiveness, some systems at ports have remained largely unchanged, including notification arrangements. Methods: A postal questionnaire was sent to Consultants in Communicable Disease Control (CsCDC) who normally receive port health notification forms from London Heathrow Port Health Control Unit relating to new entrants who had either been screened and found to have a normal chest X-ray, not had an chest X-ray due to pregnancy or young age or whose examination was inconclusive (Port 101 and 102 forms). Results: Almost half of the responding CsCDC attempted to follow-up all Port 101 and 102 referrals; of these CsCDC, 46 per cent reported that they were actually able to follow-up under 50 per cent. CsCDC had developed their own criteria to aid decisions as to which referrals to follow-up. Conclusion: The follow-up by CsCDC of new entrants passing through Heathrow Port Health Control Unit who have been screened and found to have a normal chest X-ray, not had an X-ray due to pregnancy or young age, or whose examination was inconclusive varies considerably and there is no consistent national practice. Substantial efforts are being expended on attempting to follow-up new entrants, many of whom may be at low risk of tuberculosis. The effectiveness (and efficiency) of this approach is probably low. © The Author 2005, Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health. All rights reserved.
Author Keywords
Index Keywords
Link
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-21644484060&doi=10.1093%2fpubmed%2ffdi019&partnerID=40&md5=257b453c367a27b616c61166174357ec
DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdi019
ISSN: 17413842
Cited by: 10
Original Language: English