Cancer
Volume 120, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 1401-1408

Immigration factors and prostate cancer survival among Hispanic men in California: Does neighborhood matter? (Article)

Schupp C.W.* , Press D.J. , Gomez S.L.
  • a Cancer Prevention Institute of California, 2201 Walnut Ave, Fremont, CA 94538-2334, United States
  • b Cancer Prevention Institute of California, 2201 Walnut Ave, Fremont, CA 94538-2334, United States
  • c Cancer Prevention Institute of California, 2201 Walnut Ave, Fremont, CA 94538-2334, United States, Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States

Abstract

BACKGROUND Hispanics are more likely than other racial/ethnic groups in the United States to be diagnosed with later stage of prostate cancer, yet they have lower prostate cancer mortality rates. The authors evaluated the impact of nativity and neighborhood-level Hispanic ethnic enclave on prostate cancer survival among Hispanics. METHODS A total of 35,427 Hispanic men diagnosed with invasive prostate cancer from 1995 through 2008 in the California Cancer Registry were studied; vital status data were available through 2010. Block group-level neighborhood measures were developed from US Census data. Stage-stratified Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the effect of nativity and ethnic enclave on prostate cancer survival. RESULTS In models adjusted for neighborhood socioeconomic status and other individual factors, foreign-born Hispanics were found to have a significantly lower risk of prostate cancer survival (hazards ratio [HR], 0.81; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.75-0.87). Living in an ethnic enclave appeared to modify this effect, with the survival advantage slightly more pronounced in the high ethnic enclave neighborhoods (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.71-0.86) compared with low ethnic enclave neighborhoods (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76-0.98). CONCLUSIONS Despite lower socioeconomic status, Hispanic immigrants have better survival after prostate cancer than US-born Hispanics and this pattern was more striking among those living in ethnic enclaves. Identifying the modifiable individual and neighborhood-level factors that facilitate this survival advantage in Hispanic immigrants may help to inform specific interventions to improve survival among all patients. Cancer 2014;120:1401-1408. © 2014 American Cancer Society. Despite the tendency toward a later stage of prostate cancer at the time of diagnosis and a greater likelihood of living in neighborhoods of lower socioeconomic status and Hispanic ethnic enclaves, foreign-born Hispanics had better survival after prostate cancer than US-born Hispanics. Further research is needed to examine the reasons for the observed paradox because identifying factors that facilitate this survival advantage in Hispanic immigrants may improve survival for all men with prostate cancer. © 2014 American Cancer Society.

Author Keywords

Socioeconomic status Hispanic or Latino Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) prostate neoplasm Survival

Index Keywords

Prostatic Neoplasms tumor invasion Proportional Hazards Models survival rate survival prostate cancer risk human immigration risk assessment middle aged cancer survival priority journal health status cancer risk socioeconomic status Aged Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Hispanic or Latino cancer grading prostate neoplasm Hispanic Americans Residence Characteristics United States population risk social status Humans Hispanic California male clinical evaluation Socioeconomic Factors Article major clinical study adult Emigration and Immigration ethnicity SEER Program

Link
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84899473470&doi=10.1002%2fcncr.28587&partnerID=40&md5=a0cc75b41515cbf44f9695fc0c4abb8f

DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28587
ISSN: 0008543X
Cited by: 23
Original Language: English