Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
Volume 11, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 75-83

Human Rights, Dual Loyalties, and Clinical Independence: Challenges Facing Mental Health Professionals Working in Australia's Immigration Detention Network (Article)

Essex R.*
  • a Villawood Immigration Detention Centre, Villawood, NSW, 2163, Australia

Abstract

Although Australia has comparatively few individuals seeking asylum, it has had a mandatory detention policy in place since 1992. This policy has been maintained by successive governments despite the overwhelmingly negative impact mandatory detention has on mental health. For mental health professionals working in this environment, a number of moral, ethical, and human rights issues are raised. These issues are discussed here, with a focus on dual loyalty conflicts and drawing on personal experience, the bioethics and human rights literature, and recent parliamentary inquiries. For those who continue to work in this environment, future directions are also discussed. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

Author Keywords

Immigration detention Asylum seekers human rights Mental health Dual loyalty Clinical independence

Index Keywords

Health Personnel morality mental health service Australia health care personnel mental health human epidemiology ethics middle aged trends Stress, Psychological mental stress medical ethics Ethics, Professional Mental Health Services conflict of interest Mental Disorders Moral Obligations human rights Humans migrant psychology male Emigrants and Immigrants female standards prison legislation and jurisprudence Prisons organization and management personal autonomy adult etiology

Link
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84896971299&doi=10.1007%2fs11673-013-9493-0&partnerID=40&md5=b3238b7dceb7d542011e73d4911f8805

DOI: 10.1007/s11673-013-9493-0
ISSN: 11767529
Cited by: 12
Original Language: English