Outcome studies on treatment of trauma-affected refugees have been published but are limited in design and quality. In this article, we discuss possible impediments to pursuing research aimed at gathering evidence to support the efficacy of treatments in the field and the challenges in carrying out such inquiries. We then present a working model that demonstrates the feasibility of integrating outcome research into clinical settings. The aim of this model is to involve all personnel in generating research of high quality with minimal additional costs and time commitment. We conclude that although challenges remain in carrying out treatment outcome studies, they can be overcome by careful consultation and negotiation in a setting with an established ethos of commitment to the scientific endeavor. Ultimately, identifying the most effective interventions will provide better treatment and quality of life for the large number of traumatized refugees seeking assistance for mental health problems. Copyright © 2014 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Mental health Treatment outcome Refugee trauma

Forecasting social psychology refugee mental health service mindfulness psychiatric traumatology psychological aspect Models, Organizational psychoeducation methodology nonbiological model Research Design human Refugees war Evidence-Based Practice Stress, Psychological mental stress medical ethics social network psychiatric diagnosis clinical practice Mental Health Services Feasibility Studies book human rights quality of life asylum seeker Physician's Practice Patterns evidence based practice Humans Treatment Outcome Review traumatology medical record Outcome Assessment (Health Care) feasibility study organization and management posttraumatic stress disorder Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic acceptance and commitment therapy outcome assessment psychotrauma clinical decision making Rape pharmaceutical care traffic accident Torture natural disaster