Medical Journal of Australia
Volume 201, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 393-398

Australia’s treatment of refugee and asylum seeker children: The views of Australian paediatricians (Article) (Open Access)

Corbett E.J.M.* , Gunasekera H. , Maycock A. , Isaacs D.
  • a Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  • b Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia, Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  • c Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  • d Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia, Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Abstract

Main outcome measures: Proportion of respondents by demographic characteristics using χ2 and Fisher exact test (α = 0.05).Design, setting and participants: In November 2013, we emailed a questionnaire web link to all Australian general and community paediatricians registered with the Royal Australasian College of Physicians.Objective: Australia’s response to refugees and people seeking asylum is a matter of national debate. We sought to determine the knowledge and attitudes of paediatricians about refugee and asylum seeker issues (both onshore and offshore).Results: There were 139 respondents (response rate, 40.5%). Respondents’ characteristics were broadly representative of all Australian general paediatricians. Over 80% correctly used the term “asylum seeker” rather than “boat person” or “illegal immigrant” for children applying for protection. Over 80% agreed with the Australian Medical Association assertion that mandatory detention of children constitutes child abuse, and disagreed with offshore processing. Less than half knew which subgroups were eligible for Medicare or had had pre-departure HIV and tuberculosis screening tests; or that the average stay in refugee camps before settlement in Australia was more than 10 years. Only about 60% knew that the Minister for Immigration and Citizenship was the legal guardian of detained unaccompanied minors. One in eight knew about the Medicare eligibility hotline. Respondents’ sex, where their medical degree was obtained, frequency of seeing refugees and asylum seekers and years of experience had little association with responses.Conclusions: Australian paediatricians considered mandatory detention a form of child abuse and strongly disagreed with offshore processing. There is a clear need for education about practical issues such as current health screening practices and Medicare eligibility. © 2014, Australasian Medical Publishing Co. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Author Keywords

[No Keywords available]

Index Keywords

pediatrician refugee Australia mass screening health insurance eligibility medical fee human immigration HIV test Refugees detention Medicare pediatrics health personnel attitude Attitude of Health Personnel asylum seeker Humans legal guardian tuberculosis questionnaire refugee camp Article Questionnaires physician attitude medical terminology legal aspect thorax radiography medical history health care delivery Child

Link
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84908280572&doi=10.5694%2fmja14.00279&partnerID=40&md5=db990f06d1034be00182f43228f32d7b

DOI: 10.5694/mja14.00279
ISSN: 0025729X
Cited by: 10
Original Language: English