International Journal of Children's Rights
Volume 22, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 776-806

Conditional residence for unauthorised immigrant parents: Responding to the social membership claims of their children (Review)

Sullivan M.J.
  • a Graduate International Relations Department, St. Mary's University, San Antonio, TX, United States

Abstract

In this article, I argue that states have a long-term public policy interest in applying the best interests of the child standard that they use for domestic child welfare determinations in immigration cases that involve deportable non-citizen parents. But I also recognise that the interests of existing citizens in effective immigration regulation and enforcement need to be taken into consideration. The burden lies with parents who entered and continued to reside without authorisation in a country to show that their right to remain is of benefit to existing citizens. This means that unauthorised immigrant parents should only be given conditional permission to stay in their children's country of long-term residence to raise them. Otherwise deportable parents should not be immediately legalised outright. Rather, they should be held to account for discharging their duty to their children in the same manner as immigrants whose residence is conditional for other reasons. © 2014 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Author Keywords

Deportation citizenship Best interests of the child Mixed-status families Immigration

Index Keywords

[No Keywords available]

Link
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84929087993&doi=10.1163%2f15718182-02204003&partnerID=40&md5=1048fe6e7e2b36b04a2acf0c6ebe3e40

DOI: 10.1163/15718182-02204003
ISSN: 09275568
Original Language: English