Drawing on an analysis of the media debate on two Swedish rape cases involving alcohol, the present article argues that social norms and power structures are made visible both when debaters ascribe explanatory power to alcohol and when they do not. Using feminist intersectional theory, we argue that when debaters employ the concepts of "foreign culture" and "jet-set drinking culture," respectively, to explain the rapes, they simultaneously (re)produce stereotypical discourses on gender, sexuality, class and ethnicity/nationality. The troublesome positions of the Immigrant, the Drink Slut and the Brat symbolize how these discourses intersect in the specific cases. To understand why alcohol is central in explaining rape in a fashionable area, but not in a socially disadvantaged area, we suggest that the official image of Sweden as a gender-equal, sexually liberal and multicultural society with small class differences blocks discussion of existing inequalities within the country. When rape happens in a place constructed as a "Swedish middle- and upper-class area," alcohol and intoxication are used to symbolize the "uncivilized," unpleasant and malicious among Swedish men. When rape happens in "socially disadvantaged neighbourhoods" populated by "immigrants," the unpleasant instead resides in the "foreign culture". © 2012 Taylor & Francis.

Sexuality Intersectionality Rape Gender Alcohol Discourse analysis

[No Keywords available]