'Bogus' asylum seekers are widely alleged to be 'abusing' the UK's system, whilst similar perceptions exist more widely among industrialized host states. This article examines physical mobility for the purpose of claiming asylum, and whether it is meaningful to claim that the UK asylum route is being misused or abused by 'bogus' refugees with 'socio-economic motivations'. It examines procedural and definitional challenges to existing framings of the 'right' and 'wrong' forms of asylum mobility, and tests assumptions behind what it means to be 'bogus' or 'genuine' with reference to original empirical data. This article asks how different asylum mobilities are contested and made meaningful at the 'gate', presenting a challenge to such framings to reconsider the nature of what 'problem' exists. © 2011 Taylor & Francis.

moral panic Refugee status determination Asylum seekers Restriction prevention

United Kingdom immigration policy mobility policy approach socioeconomic status refugee asylum seeker