The Lancet Infectious Diseases
Volume 11, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 435-444
Screening of immigrants in the UK for imported latent tuberculosis: A multicentre cohort study and cost-effectiveness analysis (Article) (Open Access)
Pareek M. ,
Watson J.P. ,
Ormerod L.P. ,
Kon O.M. ,
Woltmann G. ,
White P.J. ,
Abubakar I. ,
Lalvani A.*
-
a
Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
-
b
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
-
c
Chest Clinic, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn, United Kingdom
-
d
Tuberculosis Service, Chest and Allergy Clinic, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
-
e
Institute for Lung Health, University Hospitals Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom
-
f
Modelling and Economics Unit, Centre for Infections, Health Protection Agency, London, United Kingdom
-
g
Tuberculosis Section, Centre for Infections, Health Protection Agency, London, United Kingdom
-
h
Tuberculosis Research Unit, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
Abstract
Background: Continuing rises in tuberculosis notifications in the UK are attributable to cases in foreign-born immigrants. National guidance for immigrant screening is hampered by a lack of data about the prevalence of, and risk factors for, latent tuberculosis infection in immigrants. We aimed to determine the prevalence of latent infection in immigrants to the UK to define which groups should be screened and to quantify cost-effectiveness. Methods: In our multicentre cohort study and cost-effectiveness analysis we analysed demographic and test results from three centres in the UK (from 2008 to 2010) that used interferon-γ release-assay (IGRA) to screen immigrants aged 35 years or younger for latent tuberculosis infection. We assessed factors associated with latent infection by use of logistic regression and calculated the yields and cost-effectiveness of screening at different levels of tuberculosis incidence in immigrants' countries of origin with a decision analysis model. Findings: Results for IGRA-based screening were positive in 245 of 1229 immigrants (20%), negative in 982 (80%), and indeterminate in two (0·2%). Positive results were independently associated with increases in tuberculosis incidence in immigrants' countries of origin (p=0·0006), male sex (p=0·046), and age (p<0·0001). National policy thus far would fail to detect 71% of individuals with latent infection. The two most cost-effective strategies were to screen individuals from countries with a tuberculosis incidence of more than 250 cases per 100 000 (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio [ICER] was £17 956 [£1=US$1·60] per prevented case of tuberculosis) and at more than 150 cases per 100 000 (including immigrants from the Indian subcontinent), which identified 92% of infected immigrants and prevented an additional 29 cases at an ICER of £20 819 per additional case averted. Interpretation: Screening for latent infection can be implemented cost-effectively at a level of incidence that identifies most immigrants with latent tuberculosis, thereby preventing substantial numbers of future cases of active tuberculosis. Funding: Medical Research Council and Wellcome Trust. © 2011 Elsevier Ltd.
Author Keywords
[No Keywords available]
Index Keywords
Link
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-79956266431&doi=10.1016%2fS1473-3099%2811%2970069-X&partnerID=40&md5=e34694755e2e2c483d98e0832c56abfb
DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70069-X
ISSN: 14733099
Cited by: 130
Original Language: English