Malaria Journal
Volume 10, 2011

Respondent-driven sampling on the Thailand-Cambodia border. I. Can malaria cases be contained in mobile migrant workers? (Article) (Open Access)

Khamsiriwatchara A. , Wangroongsarb P. , Thwing J. , Eliades J. , Satimai W. , Delacollette C.* , Kaewkungwal J.
  • a Center of Excellence for Biomedical and Public Health Informatics (BIOPHICS), Bangkok, Thailand
  • b Bureau for Vector-borne Diseases, Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand
  • c Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, CDC, Atlanta, United States
  • d World Health Organization, Mekong Malaria Programme, Mahidol University, 420/6, Rajvithi Rd, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
  • e Bureau for Vector-borne Diseases, Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand
  • f World Health Organization, Mekong Malaria Programme, Mahidol University, 420/6, Rajvithi Rd, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
  • g Center of Excellence for Biomedical and Public Health Informatics (BIOPHICS), Bangkok, Thailand

Abstract

Background: Reliable information on mobility patterns of migrants is a crucial part of the strategy to contain the spread of artemisinin-resistant malaria parasites in South-East Asia, and may also be helpful to efforts to address other public health problems for migrants and members of host communities. In order to limit the spread of malarial drug resistance, the malaria prevention and control programme will need to devise strategies to reach cross-border and mobile migrant populations. Methodology. The Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) method was used to survey migrant workers from Cambodia and Myanmar, both registered and undocumented, in three Thai provinces on the Thailand-Cambodia border in close proximity to areas with documented artemisinin-resistant malaria parasites. 1,719 participants (828 Cambodian and 891 Myanmar migrants) were recruited. Subpopulations of migrant workers were analysed using the Thailand Ministry of Health classification based on length of residence in Thailand of greater than six months (long-term, or M1) or less than six months (short-term, or M2). Key information collected on the structured questionnaire included patterns of mobility and migration, demographic characteristics, treatment-seeking behaviours, and knowledge, perceptions, and practices about malaria. Results: Workers from Cambodia came from provinces across Cambodia, and 22% of Cambodian M1 and 72% of Cambodian M2 migrants had been in Cambodia in the last three months. Less than 6% returned with a frequency of greater than once per month. Of migrants from Cambodia, 32% of M1 and 68% of M2 were planning to return, and named provinces across Cambodia as their likely next destinations. Most workers from Myanmar came from Mon state (86%), had never returned to Myanmar (85%), and only 4% stated plans to return. Conclusion: Information on migratory patterns of migrants from Myanmar and Cambodia along the malaria endemic Thailand-Cambodian border within the artemisinin resistance containment zone will help target health interventions, including treatment follow-up and surveillance. © 2011 Khamsiriwatchara et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Author Keywords

[No Keywords available]

Index Keywords

Cambodia respondent driven sampling health care personnel Thailand human statistics Malaria social network malaria control migrant worker Humans Adolescent male female Disease Transmission, Infectious questionnaire Myanmar Article disease transmission help seeking behavior Questionnaires major clinical study migration artemisinin Malaria, Falciparum malaria falciparum endemic disease Plasmodium falciparum Endemic Diseases Emigration and Immigration drug resistance Transients and Migrants drug effect structured questionnaire health survey

Link
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-79955744014&doi=10.1186%2f1475-2875-10-120&partnerID=40&md5=d68ef6483652161e027e018458b9fbbe

DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-10-120
ISSN: 14752875
Cited by: 33
Original Language: English