Public Health Nutrition
Volume 13, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 47-53
Assessment of physical activity using accelerometry, an activity diary, the heart rate method and the Indian migration study questionnaire in South Indian adults (Article) (Open Access)
Bharathi A.V. ,
Kuriyan R. ,
Kurpad A.V. ,
Thomas T. ,
Ebrahim S. ,
Kinra S. ,
Lyngdoh T. ,
Reddy S.K. ,
Dorairaj P. ,
Vaz M.
-
a
St. John's Research Institute, St. John's National Academy of Health Sciences, Opp. Koramangala BDA Complex, Bangalore 560034, Karnataka, India
-
b
St. John's Research Institute, St. John's National Academy of Health Sciences, Opp. Koramangala BDA Complex, Bangalore 560034, Karnataka, India
-
c
St. John's Research Institute, St. John's National Academy of Health Sciences, Opp. Koramangala BDA Complex, Bangalore 560034, Karnataka, India
-
d
St. John's Research Institute, St. John's National Academy of Health Sciences, Opp. Koramangala BDA Complex, Bangalore 560034, Karnataka, India
-
e
Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
-
f
Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
-
g
Centre for Chronic Disease Control, Delhi, India
-
h
Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India, Department of Cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
-
i
Department of Cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
-
j
St. John's Research Institute, St. John's National Academy of Health Sciences, Opp. Koramangala BDA Complex, Bangalore 560034, Karnataka, India
Abstract
Objective: To validate questionnaire-based physical activity level (PAL) against accelerometry and a 24 h physical activity diary (24 h AD) as reference methods (Protocol 2), after validating these reference methods against the heart rateoxygen consumption (HRVO2) method (Protocol 1).Design Cross-sectional study.Setting Two villages in Andhra Pradesh state and Bangalore city, South India.Subjects Ninety-four participants (fifty males, forty-four females) for Protocol 2; thirteen males for Protocol 1.Results: In Protocol 2, mean PAL derived from the questionnaire (1.72 (SD 0.20)) was comparable to that from the 24 h AD (1.78 (SD 0.20)) but significantly higher than the mean PAL derived from accelerometry (1.36 (SD 0.20); P < 0.001). Mean bias of PAL from the questionnaire was larger against the accelerometer (0.36) than against the 24 h AD (0.06), but with large limits of agreement against both. Correlations of PAL from the questionnaire with that of the accelerometer (r = 0.28; P = 0.01) and the 24 h AD (r = 0.30; P = 0.006) were modest. In Protocol 1, mean PAL from the 24 h AD (1.65 (SD 0.18)) was comparable, while that from the accelerometer (1.51 (SD 0.23)) was significantly lower (P < 0.001), than mean PAL obtained from the HRVO2 method (1.69 (SD 1)).Conclusions: The questionnaire showed acceptable validity with the reference methods in a group with a wide range of physical activity levels. The accelerometer underestimated PAL in comparison with the HRVO2 method.
Author Keywords
Index Keywords
Link
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-75149116109&doi=10.1017%2fS1368980009005850&partnerID=40&md5=d19f3360b8eebaf8a355c2928b4f2647
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980009005850
ISSN: 13689800
Cited by: 18
Original Language: English