Eurosurveillance
Volume 22, Issue 40, 2017

Infectious disease screening in asylum seekers: Range, coverage and economic evaluation in Germany, 2015 (Article) (Open Access)

Bozorgmehr K.* , Wahedi K. , Noest S. , Szecsenyi J. , Razum O.
  • a Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
  • b Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
  • c Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
  • d Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
  • e Department of Epidemiology & International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany

Abstract

Screening asylum seekers for infectious diseases is widely performed, but economic evaluations of such are scarce. We performed a policy analysis and economic evaluation of such screening in Germany, and analysed the effect of screening policies on cost differences between federal states. Of the 16 states, screening was compulsory for tuberculosis (TB) in asylum seekers ≥ 16 years of age in all states as well as in children < 16 years of age and pregnant women in six states, hepatitis B and enteropathogens in three, syphilis in two and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in one state. Of 441,899 asylum seekers, 88.0% were screened for TB, 22.9% for enteropathogens, 16.9% for hepatitis B, 13.1% for syphilis and 11.3% for HIV. The total costs for compulsory screening in 2015 were 10.3 million euros (EUR). Costs per case were highest for infections with Shigella spp. (80,200 EUR), Salmonella spp. (8,000 EUR), TB in those ≥ 16 years of age (5,300 EUR) and syphilis (1,150 EUR). States with extended screening had per capita costs 2.84 times those of states that exclusively screened for TB in asylum seekers ≥ 16 years of age (p < 0.0001, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.96-4.10). Screening practices in Germany entailed high costs; evidencebased approaches to infectious disease screening are needed. © of the authors, 2017.

Author Keywords

[No Keywords available]

Index Keywords

Germany refugee enteropathogen Cost benefit analysis Human immunodeficiency virus infection mass screening economics health care policy human Communicable Diseases Refugees Salmonella Shigella feces analysis controlled study sensitivity analysis mathematical model procedures asylum seeker Young Adult Humans lung tuberculosis Adolescent male Tuberculosis, Pulmonary female tuberculosis communicable disease control Syphilis Article economic evaluation communicable disease adult major clinical study migration thorax radiography outcome assessment Emigration and Immigration infection Health Policy pregnant woman hepatitis B cost-benefit analysis program cost effectiveness Child

Link
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85031290993&doi=10.2807%2f1560-7917.ES.2017.22.40.16-00677&partnerID=40&md5=447a24c51c2a514a7a394d38e8fc1b94

DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2017.22.40.16-00677
ISSN: 1025496X
Cited by: 8
Original Language: English