Third World Quarterly
Volume 38, Issue 9, 2017, Pages 2159-2170

‘State of exception’ or ‘state in exile’? The fallacy of appropriating Agamben on Palestinian refugee camps (Article)

Tuastad D.*
  • a Center for Islamic and Middle East Studies, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

Abstract

To refer to Palestinian refugee camps as states of exception, appropriating the paradigm of Giorgio Agamben, is definitely tempting. Agamben argues that in times of crisis, individual rights of citizens are diminished and entire categories of people kept outside the political system. Nevertheless, there are flaws in applying Agamben’s perspective on Palestinian camps. It acquits the camp residents from the autonomy over their own political agency. Historically, in Lebanon, camp residents experienced an almost limitless access to free political organisation. But this access has not been converted into the development of representative, legitimate political structures. © 2016 Southseries Inc., www.thirdworldquarterly.com.

Author Keywords

Participation and power migration and refugees democratisation Authoritarianism Palestine

Index Keywords

political system participatory approach autonomy refugee political power democratization Palestine human rights Lebanon migration

Link
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85006857233&doi=10.1080%2f01436597.2016.1256765&partnerID=40&md5=9df434b8a5a9aa7f29380fd98e94f443

DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2016.1256765
ISSN: 01436597
Cited by: 2
Original Language: English