PLoS ONE
Volume 14, Issue 5, 2019

Restrictive state laws aimed at immigrants: Effects on enrollment in the food stamp program by U.S. Citizen children in immigrant families (Article) (Open Access)

Twersky S.E.*
  • a Health Services Administration and Policy, Temple University College of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, United States

Abstract

This paper examines whether a chilling effect of restrictive state laws aimed at immigrants creates a barrier to enrollment in the food stamp program (now called the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or SNAP) for U.S. citizen children in low-income immigrant families. This analysis looks at 20 states in the continental United States from 2000 to 2008 that were either at or above the U.S. average for percentage of foreign-born population, or states that ranked in the top 10 percent in terms of change in foreign-born population for that time period. To examine this issue, a multivariate, regression-based difference-in-differences (DD) analysis was applied. The “treatment” group is immigrant families with a U.S. citizen child that is 130% of the federal poverty level or below in states with restrictive immigrant related legislation and the “control” group is native families meeting the same federal poverty level guidelines as well as low-income immigrant families in states without the restrictive legislation. The research findings show that there does not appear to be a chilling effect associated with restrictive state laws on participation in the food stamp program. Food insecurity is an immediate need that may override the impediments to enrollment due to immigration status, causing families to apply despite a negative climate toward immigrants. For policy makers and immigrant advocates it is important to know where chilling effects might not occur in order to work with politicians and federal agencies on crafting sound evidence-based policy. Independent of any chilling effect, the model shows that immigrant families are less likely to enroll in food stamp benefits, consistent with other literature. In addition, independent of the effects of restrictive immigration legislation, both non-citizen and naturalized mothers were less likely to be in a family with food stamp benefits compared to similar native-born mothers. This indicates that all states have a gap in food stamp program enrollment that merits further attention and research. © 2019 Sylvia E. Twersky. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Author Keywords

[No Keywords available]

Index Keywords

sound immigrant law public figure lowest income group indigenous people poverty immigration human controlled study climate United States female food assistance Article mother food insecurity attention practice guideline cold stress Child

Link
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85065461724&doi=10.1371%2fjournal.pone.0215327&partnerID=40&md5=48285cdd75261efac1b1fe6fe58e4e8a

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215327
ISSN: 19326203
Original Language: English