Environment International
Volume 122, 2019, Pages 31-51
Priority focus areas for a sub-national response to climate change and health: A South African provincial case study (Review) (Open Access)
Godsmark C.N. ,
Irlam J. ,
van der Merwe F. ,
New M. ,
Rother H.-A.*
-
a
Division of Environmental Health, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa
-
b
Division of Environmental Health, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa, Primary Health Care Directorate, University of Cape Town, South Africa
-
c
Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning, Western Cape Government, South Africa
-
d
African Climate and Development Initiative, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa, School of International Development, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
-
e
Division of Environmental Health, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa
Abstract
Introduction: The intersection of health and climate change is often absent or under-represented in sub-national government strategies. This analysis of the literature, using a new methodological framework, highlights priority focus areas for a sub-national government response to health and climate change, using the Western Cape (WC) province of South Africa as a case study. Methods: A methodological framework was created to conduct a review of priority focus areas relevant for sub-national governments. The framework encompassed the establishment of a Project Steering Group consisting of relevant, sub-national stakeholders (e.g. provincial officials, public and environmental health specialists and academics); an analysis of local climatic projections as well as an analysis of global, national and sub-national health risk factors and impacts. Results: Globally, the discussion of health and climate change adaptation strategies in sub-national, or provincial government is often limited. For the case study presented, multiple health risk factors were identified. WC climatic projections include a warmer and potentially drier future with an increased frequency and intensity of extreme weather events. WC government priority focus areas requiring further research on health risk factors include: population migration and environmental refugees, land use change, violence and human conflict and vulnerable groups. WC government priority focus areas for further research on health impacts include: mental ill-health, non-communicable diseases, injuries, poisonings (e.g. pesticides), food and nutrition insecurity-related diseases, water- and food-borne diseases and reproductive health. These areas are currently under-addressed, or not addressed at all, in the current provincial climate change strategy. Conclusions: Sub-national government adaptation strategies often display limited discussion on the health and climate change intersect. The methodological framework presented in this case study can be globally utilized by other sub-national governments for decision-making and development of climate change and health adaptation strategies. Additionally, due to the broad range of sectoral issues identified, a primary recommendation from this study is that sub-national governments internationally should consider a “health and climate change in all policies” approach when developing adaptation and mitigation strategies to address climate change. © 2018 The Authors
Author Keywords
Index Keywords
Link
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85058502273&doi=10.1016%2fj.envint.2018.11.035&partnerID=40&md5=984b778b7c815d580003cf8e3c9b4523
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.11.035
ISSN: 01604120
Original Language: English