BMC Health Services Research
Volume 9, 2009
Differences between immigrant and non-immigrant groups in the use of primary medical care; A systematic review (Article) (Open Access)
Uiters E.* ,
Devillé W. ,
Foets M. ,
Spreeuwenberg P. ,
Groenewegen P.P.
-
a
NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands, RIVM, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands
-
b
NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands
-
c
Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
-
d
NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands
-
e
NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands
Abstract
Background. Studies on differences between immigrant and non-immigrant groups in health care utilization vary with respect to the extent and direction of differences in use. Therefore, our study aimed to provide a systematic overview of the existing research on differences in primary care utilization between immigrant groups and the majority population. Methods. For this review PubMed, PsycInfo, Cinahl, Sociofile, Web of Science and Current Contents were consulted. Study selection and quality assessment was performed using a predefined protocol by 2 reviewers independently of each other. Only original, quantitative, peer-reviewed papers were taken into account. To account for this hierarchical structure, logistic multilevel analyses were performed to examine the extent to which differences are found across countries and immigrant groups. Differences in primary care use were related to study characteristics, strength of the primary care system and methodological quality. Results. A total of 37 studies from 7 countries met all inclusion criteria. Remarkably, studies performed within the US more often reported a significant lower use among immigrant groups as compared to the majority population than the other countries. As studies scored higher on methodological quality, the likelihood of reporting significant differences increased. Adjustment for health status and use of culture-/language-adjusted procedures during the data collection were negatively related to reporting significant differences in the studies. Conclusion. Our review underlined the need for careful design in studies of differences in health care use between immigrant groups and the majority population. The results from studies concerning differences between immigrant and the majority population in primary health care use performed within the US might be interpreted as a reflection of a weaker primary care system in the US compared to Europe and Canada. © 2009 Uiters et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Author Keywords
[No Keywords available]
Index Keywords
Link
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-67651159209&doi=10.1186%2f1472-6963-9-76&partnerID=40&md5=99722584505800b559032ca1d3e96fe5
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-76
ISSN: 14726963
Cited by: 51
Original Language: English