Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Volume 88, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 134-148

Stillbirths and infant deaths among migrants in industrialized countries (Review)

Gissler M.* , Alexander S. , Macfarlane A. , Small R. , Stray-Pedersen B. , Zeitlin J. , Zimbeck M. , Gagnon A.
  • a STAKES National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health, Helsinki, Finland, Nordic School of Public Health, Gothenburg, Sweden
  • b Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
  • c School of Community and Health Sciences, City University, London, United Kingdom
  • d Mother and Child Health Research, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  • e Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oslo, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
  • f INSERM, UMR S16, Epidemiological Research Unit on Perinatal and Women's Health, Paris, France
  • g INSERM, UMR S16, Epidemiological Research Unit on Perinatal and Women's Health, Paris, France
  • h McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada

Abstract

Introduction. The relation of migration to infant outcomes is unclear. There are studies which show that some migrant groups have similar or even better outcomes than those from the receiving country. Equally, raised risk of adverse outcomes for other migrant groups has been reported. Objective. We sought to determine (1) if migrants in western industrialized countries have consistently higher risks of stillbirth, neonatal mortality, or infant mortality, (2) if there are migrant sub-groups at potentially higher risk, and (3) what might be the explanations for any risk differences found. Design and Setting. Systematic review of the literature on perinatal health outcomes among migrants in western industrialized countries. Methods and Main outcome measures. Drawing on a larger systematic review of perinatal outcomes and migration, we reviewed studies including mortality outcomes (stillbirths and infant deaths). Results. Eligible studies gave conflicting results. Half (53%) reported worse mortality outcomes, one third (35%) reported no differences and a few (13%) reported better outcomes for births to migrants compared to the receiving country population. Refugees were the most vulnerable group. For non-refugees, non-European migrants in Europe and foreign-born blacks in the United States had the highest excess mortality. In general, adjustment of background factors did not explain the increased mortality rate among migrants. Regarding causes of death, higher preterm birth rates explained the increased mortality figures among some migrant groups. The increased mortality from congenital anomalies may be related to restricted access to screening, but also to differing attitudes to screening and termination of pregnancy. Conclusions. Mortality risk among babies born to migrants is not consistently higher, but appears to be greatest among refugees, non-European migrants to Europe, and foreign-born blacks in the US. To understand this variation better, more information is needed about migrant background, such as length of time in receiving country and receiving country language fluency. Additional data on demographic, health care, biological, medical, and socioeconomic risk factors should be gathered and analyzed in greater detail. © 2009 Informa UK Ltd. (Informa Healthcare, Taylor & Francis AS).

Author Keywords

Perinatal health infant health Cause of death migrant Mortality Refugee

Index Keywords

immigrant refugee attributable risk human Health Behavior Refugees industrialization statistics risk assessment Developed Countries priority journal ethnology Humans pregnancy termination sudden infant death syndrome Infant, Newborn female Infant congenital malformation Review newborn pregnancy pregnancy outcome migration health care access developed country patient attitude outcome assessment Infant Mortality newborn mortality prenatal screening stillbirth Transients and Migrants cause of death systematic review child death

Link
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-59649121330&doi=10.1080%2f00016340802603805&partnerID=40&md5=61f01b056495039a0575338786eebaef

DOI: 10.1080/00016340802603805
ISSN: 00016349
Cited by: 107
Original Language: English