European Journal of Public Health
Volume 18, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 681-687

A comparison of physicians' end-of-life decision making for non-western migrants and Dutch natives in the Netherlands (Article) (Open Access)

Buiting H.M. , Rietjens J.A.C. , Onwuteaka-Philipsen B.D. , Van Der Maas P.J. , Van Delden J.J.M. , Van Der Heide A.
  • a Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands, Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
  • b Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
  • c Department of Public and Occupational Health, Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center, Netherlands
  • d Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
  • e Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
  • f Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands

Abstract

Background: Non-western migrants have a different cultural background that influences their attitudes towards healthcare. As the first wave of this relatively young group is growing older, we investigated, for the first time, whether end-of-life decision-making practices for non-western migrants differ from Dutch natives. Methods: In 2005, we sent questionnaires to physicians who attended deaths identified from the central death registry of Statistics Netherlands (n = 9651; non-western migrants: n = 627, total response: 78%). We performed multivariate logistic regression analyses adjusted for age, sex and cause of death. Results: Of all deaths of non-western origin, 54% were non-sudden, whereas 67% of all deaths with a Dutch origin were non-sudden (P = 0.00). A relatively large number of non-suddenly deceased persons of non-western origin had died under the age of 65 (53%) as compared to Dutch natives (15%). Euthanasia was performed in 2.4% of all non-suddenly deceased persons in the non-western migrant group as compared to 2.7% in the native Dutch group (adjusted odds ratio = 0.82, P = 0.63). Alleviation of symptoms with a potential life-shortening effect was somewhat lower for non-western migrants (30% vs. 38%; adjusted odds ratio = 0.78, P = 0.07). Physicians decided to forgo potentially life-prolonging treatment in comparable rates (26% vs. 23%; adjusted odds ratio = 1.1, P = 0.73). Yet, the type of treatments forgone and underlying reasons differed. Conclusion: Euthanasia was not less common among non-suddenly deceased non-western migrants as compared to Dutch natives. However, intensive symptom alleviation was used less frequently and forgoing potentially life-prolonging treatment involved different characteristics. These findings suggest that cultural factors may affect end-of-life decision making. © The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved.

Author Keywords

culture End-of-life migrant Ethnicity Decision-making

Index Keywords

patient care Netherlands immigrant indigenous people multivariate logistic regression analysis register human middle aged priority journal Aged Physicians clinical practice euthanasia Young Adult Humans ethnic difference Adolescent male female Aged, 80 and over Terminal Care questionnaire cultural factor symptom Article Palliative Care physician attitude adult major clinical study age distribution normal human medical decision making Transients and Migrants cause of death decision making attitude to health

Link
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-56749179486&doi=10.1093%2feurpub%2fckn084&partnerID=40&md5=88f638636d20777e44c4d3eb6dea3a09

DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckn084
ISSN: 11011262
Cited by: 14
Original Language: English