European Journal of Public Health
Volume 18, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 681-687
A comparison of physicians' end-of-life decision making for non-western migrants and Dutch natives in the Netherlands (Article) (Open Access)
Buiting H.M. ,
Rietjens J.A.C. ,
Onwuteaka-Philipsen B.D. ,
Van Der Maas P.J. ,
Van Delden J.J.M. ,
Van Der Heide A.
-
a
Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands, Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
-
b
Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
-
c
Department of Public and Occupational Health, Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center, Netherlands
-
d
Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
-
e
Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
-
f
Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
Abstract
Background: Non-western migrants have a different cultural background that influences their attitudes towards healthcare. As the first wave of this relatively young group is growing older, we investigated, for the first time, whether end-of-life decision-making practices for non-western migrants differ from Dutch natives. Methods: In 2005, we sent questionnaires to physicians who attended deaths identified from the central death registry of Statistics Netherlands (n = 9651; non-western migrants: n = 627, total response: 78%). We performed multivariate logistic regression analyses adjusted for age, sex and cause of death. Results: Of all deaths of non-western origin, 54% were non-sudden, whereas 67% of all deaths with a Dutch origin were non-sudden (P = 0.00). A relatively large number of non-suddenly deceased persons of non-western origin had died under the age of 65 (53%) as compared to Dutch natives (15%). Euthanasia was performed in 2.4% of all non-suddenly deceased persons in the non-western migrant group as compared to 2.7% in the native Dutch group (adjusted odds ratio = 0.82, P = 0.63). Alleviation of symptoms with a potential life-shortening effect was somewhat lower for non-western migrants (30% vs. 38%; adjusted odds ratio = 0.78, P = 0.07). Physicians decided to forgo potentially life-prolonging treatment in comparable rates (26% vs. 23%; adjusted odds ratio = 1.1, P = 0.73). Yet, the type of treatments forgone and underlying reasons differed. Conclusion: Euthanasia was not less common among non-suddenly deceased non-western migrants as compared to Dutch natives. However, intensive symptom alleviation was used less frequently and forgoing potentially life-prolonging treatment involved different characteristics. These findings suggest that cultural factors may affect end-of-life decision making. © The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved.
Author Keywords
Index Keywords
Link
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-56749179486&doi=10.1093%2feurpub%2fckn084&partnerID=40&md5=88f638636d20777e44c4d3eb6dea3a09
DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckn084
ISSN: 11011262
Cited by: 14
Original Language: English