Maternal and Child Health Journal
Volume 20, Issue 9, 2016, Pages 1849-1860

Latina Birth Outcomes in California: Not so Paradoxical (Article)

Sanchez-Vaznaugh E.V.* , Braveman P.A. , Egerter S. , Marchi K.S. , Heck K. , Curtis M.
  • a Department of Health Education, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Ave., San Francisco, CA 94132, United States, Center on Social Disparities in Health, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
  • b Center on Social Disparities in Health, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
  • c Center on Social Disparities in Health, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
  • d Center on Social Disparities in Health, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
  • e Center on Social Disparities in Health, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
  • f Surveillance, Assessment and Program Development Section, Epidemiology, Assessment and Program Development Branch, Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, California Department of Public Health, Sacramento, CA, United States

Abstract

Objectives To investigate Latina-White differences in birth outcomes in California from 2003 to 2010, looking for evidence of the often-cited “Latina paradox” and assessing the possible role of socioeconomic factors in observed differences. MethodsUsing statewide-representative data from the California Maternal and Infant Health Assessment, an annual population-based postpartum survey, we compared rates of preterm birth (PTB) and low birth weight (LBW) in five groups: U.S.-born non-Latina Whites (“Whites”), U.S.-born Mexican–Americans, U.S.-born non-Mexican Latinas, Mexican immigrants, and non-Mexican Latina immigrants. Logistic regression models examined the relative likelihood of PTB and LBW for women in each Latina subgroup compared with Whites, before and after adjustment for socioeconomic and other covariates. Results In unadjusted analyses, women in each Latina subgroup appeared more likely than White women to have PTB and LBW, although the increased likelihood of LBW among Mexican immigrants was statistically non-significant. After adjustment for less favorable socioeconomic characteristics among Latinas compared with Whites, observed differences in the estimated likelihoods of PTB or LBW for Latina subgroups relative to Whites were attenuated and (with the exception of PTB among U.S.-born Mexican Americans) no longer statistically significant. Conclusions We found no evidence of a “Latina paradox” in birth outcomes, which some have cited as evidence that social disadvantage is not always health-damaging. As observed in several previous studies, our findings were non-paradoxical: consistent with their socioeconomic disadvantage, Latinas had worse birth outcomes than non-Latina White women. Policy-makers should not rely on a “Latina paradox” to ensure good birth outcomes among socioeconomically disadvantaged Latina women. © 2016, Springer Science+Business Media New York.

Author Keywords

Socioeconomic factors Disparities in preterm birth Latina paradox Low birth weight

Index Keywords

prenatal care Caucasian Population Surveillance human epidemiology Health Behavior middle aged Premature Birth statistics and numerical data Logistic Models ethnology Mexico Hispanic Americans Young Adult Humans migrant Hispanic Adolescent California Infant, Newborn Emigrants and Immigrants female Socioeconomic Factors risk factor Risk Factors newborn socioeconomics pregnancy Infant, Low Birth Weight low birth weight pregnancy outcome adult European Continental Ancestry Group prematurity statistical model health survey
Link
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84962264166&doi=10.1007%2fs10995-016-1988-y&partnerID=40&md5=96aef014fa7a3fe2653d8f2c6a5a59dd
DOI: 10.1007/s10995-016-1988-y
ISSN: 10927875
Cited by: 7
Original Language: English