International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Volume 126, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 244-247

Obstetric care in a migrant population with free access to health care (Article)

Almeida L.M.* , Santos C.C. , Caldas J.P. , Ayres-De-Campos D. , Dias S.
  • a Institute of Public Health, University of Porto Medical School, Porto, Portugal, Centre for Research and Intervention in Education, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal, Iberoamerican Observatory of Health and Citizenship, Porto, Portugal
  • b Centre for Research in Health Technologies and Information Systems, Department of Information Sciences and Decision in Health, University of Porto Medical School, Porto, Portugal
  • c Centre for Research and Intervention in Education, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal, Iberoamerican Observatory of Health and Citizenship, Porto, Portugal
  • d Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Porto Medical School, São João Hospital, Porto, Portugal
  • e Institute of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, New University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal

Abstract

Objective To evaluate differences in obstetric care between immigrant and native women in a country with free access to health care. Methods A cross-sectional study was carried out of immigrant mothers delivering in one of the four public hospitals in the Porto, Portugal, metropolitan area between February and December 2012. The comparison group included native Portuguese mothers who delivered in the same institutions. The participants (89 immigrant mothers and 188 Portuguese mothers) were recruited by telephone and completed a written questionnaire during a home visit. Results Immigrant women were more likely to have their first pregnancy appointment after 12 weeks of pregnancy (27.0% vs 14.4%, P = 0.011) and to have fewer than three prenatal visits (2.2% vs 0.0%, P < 0.001). They were also more likely to have had a cesarean delivery (48.3% vs 31.4%, P = 0.023), perineal laceration (48.8% vs 11.6%, P < 0.001), or postpartum hemorrhage (33.5% vs 12.3%, P < 0.001). Conclusion Migrants were more prone to late prenatal care and to intrapartum complications. Unsatisfactory interactions with healthcare staff may play an important role in these findings. © 2014 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

Author Keywords

maternal health services Portugal immigrants Prenatal care Pregnancy complications Patient satisfaction

Index Keywords

urban population immigrant multicenter study prenatal care Portugal health care personnel human epidemiology statistics and numerical data prenatal period controlled study priority journal professional practice Databases, Factual factual database Cross-Sectional Studies Young Adult cross-sectional study migrant Humans Emigrants and Immigrants female clinical evaluation Socioeconomic Factors perineum injury socioeconomics perineal laceration telephone interview questionnaire pregnancy postpartum hemorrhage public hospital standards Article pregnancy outcome major clinical study mother adult health care quality health care access Quality Assurance, Health Care vaginal delivery Perinatal Care Brazil pregnant woman obstetric procedure laceration gestational age cesarean section Health Services Accessibility health care delivery

Link
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84905584767&doi=10.1016%2fj.ijgo.2014.03.023&partnerID=40&md5=131f24b6e9305e3f353358ae43422b05

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.03.023
ISSN: 00207292
Cited by: 12
Original Language: English