International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Volume 132, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 151-155
Exploring disparities in prenatal care between refugees and local South African women (Article)
Kibiribiri E.T. ,
Moodley D.* ,
Groves A.K. ,
Sebitloane M.H.
-
a
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, 4051, South Africa
-
b
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, 4051, South Africa
-
c
Centre on Health, Risk and Society, American University, Washington, DC, United States
-
d
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, 4051, South Africa
Abstract
Objective To explore possible disparities in prenatal care between refugees and South African women attending public health facilities in an urban setting in South Africa. Methods A cross-sectional, mixed methods study was conducted at four public health clinics providing prenatal services in Durban between January 29, 2013, and June 15, 2013. Pretested client-satisfaction questionnaires were administered to 200 women attending immunization services at the clinics whose infants were aged 6 months or younger. An additional 16 refugees participated in in-depth interviews. Finally, a maternity chart audit was conducted to compare the quality of basic prenatal care. Results Among the women enrolled, 78 (39.0%) were refugees and 122 (61.0%) were South African citizens. Dissatisfaction was reported by 23 (19.3%) of 119 citizens and 32 (43.2%) of 74 refugees (P < 0.001). However, the maternity chart audit of 68 participants (31 refugees, 37 citizens) did not reveal significant disparities in the quality of prenatal care. The most recurring categories arising in the in-depth interviews were linguistic barriers and the challenges faced when using informal interpreters. Conclusion There were no significant disparities in prenatal care; however, refugees unable to communicate in the local languages reported that they were not provided with relevant health information and occasionally faced restricted access to prenatal services. © 2015 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Author Keywords
Index Keywords
Link
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84959513340&doi=10.1016%2fj.ijgo.2015.07.007&partnerID=40&md5=6c9753ad7874b64cf06aac8d78cc3d34
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.07.007
ISSN: 00207292
Cited by: 2
Original Language: English