Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Volume 51, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 284-291

Initial Validation of the Daily Spiritual Experiences Scale in Chinese Immigrants with Cancer Pain (Article)

Lo G.* , Chen J. , Wasser T. , Portenoy R. , Dhingra L.
  • a VA Pacific Islands Health Care System, Honolulu, HI, United States
  • b MJHS, Institute for Innovation in Palliative Care, 39 Broadway, New York, NY 10006, United States
  • c Complete Statistical Services, Macungie, PA, United States
  • d MJHS, Institute for Innovation in Palliative Care, 39 Broadway, New York, NY 10006, United States, Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States
  • e MJHS, Institute for Innovation in Palliative Care, 39 Broadway, New York, NY 10006, United States

Abstract

Context Evaluating religious/spiritual influences in the growing Chinese-American population may inform the development of culturally relevant palliative care interventions. Objectives We assessed the psychometric properties and acceptability of the Daily Spiritual Experiences Scale-Chinese (DSES-C) in Chinese Americans with cancer-related pain. Methods The translated 16-item DSES-C was administered as part of a symptom intervention for Chinese-American cancer patients. Patients were recruited from four New York community oncology practices. Results Of 321 patients, 78.7% were born in Mainland China, 79.1% spoke Cantonese, and 70.2% endorsed a religious affiliation (Ancestor worship, 31.7%; Chinese God worship, 29.8%; Buddhism, 17.1%; Christianity, 14.0%). In total, 82.6% completed the DSES-C (mean age = 57.7 years; 60.8% women) and 17.4% declined (mean age = 59.3 years; 52.0% women). Reasons for declining included low religiosity or perceived relevance of the scale items and difficulties separating spirituality from religiosity terms. Individuals having a religious affiliation were more likely to complete the DSES-C, whereas those not engaging in individual spiritual/religious practices or frequent group spiritual/religious practices tended to decline (all P < 0.05). The DSES-C (mean total score = 43.6, SD = 19.3) demonstrated high reliability (alpha = 0.94). Exploratory factor analysis suggested a one-factor solution, with significant loadings (>0.40) across items except Item 14 ("Accept others"). Construct validity was suggested by a positive association between DSES-C scores and having a religious affiliation (P < 0.05). Conclusion In Chinese Americans with cancer pain, the DSES-C demonstrated acceptable psychometrics. Some participants experienced linguistic or cultural barriers preventing completion. Future investigations should provide additional validation in different Asian subgroups and those with varied medical conditions. © 2016 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine.

Author Keywords

pain Immigrant health Cancer disparities Validity Reliability Daily Spiritual Experiences Scale-Chinese ethnic Chinese

Index Keywords

rating scale China immigrant multicenter study Catholicism clinical trial human validation study middle aged Christianity Aged language ethnology Psychological Tests religion procedures United States Buddhism Humans migrant psychology New York male Emigrants and Immigrants Asian American female Aged, 80 and over very elderly Malaysia questionnaire cultural factor Psychometrics Spirituality psychologic test Article psychometry scoring system palliative therapy Palliative Care major clinical study adult Daily Spiritual Experience Scale Chinese Cancer Pain Hong Kong Taoism factorial analysis

Link
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84955585781&doi=10.1016%2fj.jpainsymman.2015.10.002&partnerID=40&md5=6c1fd33ff1e7e3162a527174c92df37a

DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.10.002
ISSN: 08853924
Cited by: 2
Original Language: English