European Journal of Public Health
Volume 27, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 433-439

Interventions to improve immigrant health. A scoping review (Review) (Open Access)

Diaz E.* , Ortiz-Barreda G. , Ben-Shlomo Y. , Holdsworth M. , Salami B. , Rammohan A. , Chung R.Y.-N. , Padmadas S.S. , Krafft T.
  • a Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Kalfarveien 31, Bergen, 5018, Norway, Norwegian Centre for Minority Health Research, Oslo, Norway
  • b Department of Health Promotion and Development, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
  • c School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
  • d School of Health and Related Research-ScHARR, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
  • e Faculty of Nursing, University of AlbertaAB, Canada
  • f Discipline of Economics, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
  • g School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  • h University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
  • i Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Netherlands

Abstract

Background: Disparities in health between immigrants and their host populations have been described across countries and continents. Hence, interventions for improving health targeting general populations are not necessarily effective for immigrants. Aims: To conduct a systematic search of the literature evaluating health interventions for immigrants; to map the characteristics of identified studies including range of interventions, immigrant populations and their host countries, clinical areas targeted and reported evaluations, challenges and limitations of the interventions identified. Following the results, to develop recommendations for research in the field. Methods: A scoping review approach was chosen to provide an overview of the type, extent and quantity of research available. Studies were included if they empirically evaluated health interventions targeting immigrants and/or their descendants, included a control group, and were published in English (PubMed and Embase from 1990 to 2015). Results: Most of the 83 studies included were conducted in the USA, encompassed few immigrant groups and used a randomized controlled trial (RCT) or cluster RCT design. Most interventions addressed chronic and non-communicable diseases and attendance at cancer screening services, used individual targeted approaches, targeted adult women and recruited participants from health centres. Outcome measures were often subjective, with the exception of interventions for cardiovascular risk and diabetes. Generally, authors claimed that interventions were beneficial, despite a number of reported limitations. Conclusions: Recommendations for enhancing interventions to improve immigrant health are provided to help researchers, funders and health care commissioners when deciding upon the scope, nature and design of future research in this area. © 2017 The Author.

Author Keywords

[No Keywords available]

Index Keywords

Emigrants and Immigrants health status health disparity Health Status Disparities human Humans migrant
Link
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85026741579&doi=10.1093%2feurpub%2fckx001&partnerID=40&md5=6c14aa34670fb9b835161803cbac6884
DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx001
ISSN: 11011262
Cited by: 14
Original Language: English