Journal of Adolescent Health
Volume 63, Issue 6, 2018, Pages 745-752
Evaluation of a Tool to Identify Child Sex Trafficking Victims in Multiple Healthcare Settings (Article)
Greenbaum V.J.* ,
Livings M.S. ,
Lai B.S. ,
Edinburgh L. ,
Baikie P. ,
Grant S.R. ,
Kondis J. ,
Petska H.W. ,
Bowman M.J. ,
Legano L. ,
Kas-Osoka O. ,
Self-Brown S.
-
a
Stephanie V. Blank Center for Safe and Healthy Children, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, Georgia
-
b
School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
-
c
School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
-
d
Midwest Children's Resource Center, Children's Hospital and Clinics of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, United States
-
e
Denver Health, Now at Colorado Department of Human Services, Denver, CO, United States
-
f
Cook Children's Hospital, Fort-Worth, TX, United States
-
g
Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MS, United States
-
h
Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States, Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
-
i
Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States
-
j
Bellevue Hospital, New York City, NY, United States
-
k
Las Vegas School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, United States
-
l
School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Abstract
Purpose: Estimate the prevalence of child sex trafficking (CST) among patients seeking care in multiple healthcare settings; evaluate a short screening tool to identify victims in a healthcare setting. Methods: This cross-sectional observational study involved patients from 16 sites throughout the U.S.: five pediatric emergency departments, six child advocacy centers, and five teen clinics. Participants included English-speaking youth ages 11–17 years. For emergency department sites, inclusion criteria included a chief complaint of sexual violence. Data on several domains were gathered through self-report questionnaires and examiner interview. Main outcomes included prevalence of CST among eligible youth; sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive values, and positive/negative likelihood ratios for a CST screening tool. Results: Eight hundred and ten participants included 91 (11.52%) youth from emergency departments, 395 (48.8%) from child advocacy centers, and 324 (40.0%) from teen clinics. Overall prevalence of CST was 11.1%: 13.2% among emergency department patients, 6.3% among child advocacy center patients, and 16.4% among teen clinic patients, respectively. The screen had a sensitivity, specificity, and positive likelihood ratio of 84.44% (75.28, 91.23), 57.50% (53.80, 61.11), and 1.99% (1.76, 2.25), respectively. Conclusions: This study demonstrates a significant rate of CST among patients presenting to emergency departments (for sexual violence complaints), child advocacy centers, and teen clinics. A six-item screen showed relatively good sensitivity and moderate specificity. Negative predictive value was high. Intervention for a “positive” screen may identify victims and help prevent high-risk youth from becoming victimized. This is one of the first CST screening tools specifically developed and evaluated in the healthcare setting. © 2018 Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine
Author Keywords
Index Keywords
Link
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85055886609&doi=10.1016%2fj.jadohealth.2018.06.032&partnerID=40&md5=015fceba4dc71effd92ab55a2f160ee4
DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.06.032
ISSN: 1054139X
Cited by: 3
Original Language: English