A disturbing economic reality confronts consumers today: thousands of farm workers are enslaved in U.S. agricultural fields, forced to work without pay amid deplorable conditions and under the constant threat of violence. If structural economic injustices perpetuate modern-day agricultural slavery, then it is necessary to promote consumer practices that resist these abusive dynamics. But a consumption-oriented strategy does not necessarily restore either personal agency or communal relations damaged by agricultural trafficking. This essay proposes a framework for aesthetic solidarity that cultivates affective bonds necessary for building communities of resistance characterized by mutuality, equality, and participation. © 2018 Journal of Religious Ethics, Inc.

Solidarity Slavery consumption aesthetics Trafficking

[No Keywords available]