AMA Journal of Ethics
Volume 19, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 91-97

Groupthink: How should clinicians respond to human trafficking? (Article)

Cheshire W.P., Jr.
  • a Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Abstract

Human trafficking is a pervasive problem that exceeds the capacity of social and organizational resources to restrain and for which guidelines are inadequate to assist medical professionals in responding to the special needs of victims when they present as patients. One obstacle to appropriate disagreement with an inadequate status quo is the lure of group cohesion. “Groupthink” is a social psychological phenomenon in which presumed group consensus prevails despite potentially adverse consequences. In the context of the medical response to human trafficking, groupthink may foster complacency, rationalize acquiescence with inaction on the basis of perceived futility, create an illusion of unanimity, and accommodate negative stereotyping. Despite these inhibiting influences, even in apparently futile situations, medical professionals have unique opportunities to be a force for good. © 2017 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Author Keywords

[No Keywords available]

Index Keywords

Health Personnel Psychology, Social Dissent and Disputes social psychology Stereotyping health care personnel conflict human health service medical ethics Humans psychology consensus health services human trafficking thinking Ethics, Clinical crime victim Delivery of Health Care health care delivery Crime Victims

Link
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85015579721&doi=10.1001%2fjournalofethics.2016.19.1.msoc3-1701&partnerID=40&md5=cc32290d1eaac719e51ae924f2c9a1a8

DOI: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.19.1.msoc3-1701
ISSN: 23766980
Cited by: 3
Original Language: English