Health Promotion International
Volume 29, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 692-704
Cultural tailoring to promote hepatitis B screening in Turkish Dutch: A randomized control study (Article) (Open Access)
Van Der Veen Y.J.J.* ,
Van Empelen P. ,
De Zwart O. ,
Visser H. ,
Mackenbach J.P. ,
Richardus J.H.
-
a
Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands, Municipal Public Health Service GGD Rotterdam-Rijnmond, Division of Infectious Diseases Control, PO Box 70032, Rotterdam, 3000 LP, Netherlands
-
b
Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands, Department of Lifestyle, TNO Quality of Life, Leiden, Netherlands
-
c
Municipal Public Health Service GGD Rotterdam-Rijnmond, Division of Infectious Diseases Control, PO Box 70032, Rotterdam, 3000 LP, Netherlands
-
d
Municipal Public Health Service GGD Rotterdam-Rijnmond, Division of Infectious Diseases Control, PO Box 70032, Rotterdam, 3000 LP, Netherlands
-
e
Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
-
f
Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands, Municipal Public Health Service GGD Rotterdam-Rijnmond, Division of Infectious Diseases Control, PO Box 70032, Rotterdam, 3000 LP, Netherlands
Abstract
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections are an important health problem in Turkish migrants in the Netherlands. This study describes the effectiveness of a culturally tailored internet intervention promoting HBV screening in Turkish migrants. Methods: Turkish migrants, aged 16-40 years old, could participate in an online intervention offering either: (i) behaviourally plus culturally tailored (BCT) information; (ii) behaviourally tailored (BT) information or (iii) generic information (GI). Subsequently, free HBV screening was offered. Results: Out of 10.069 invited persons, 1512 (15%) logged in on the website and 623 people were tested. Screening uptake was 44% in the BCT group, 46% in the GI group and 44% in group BT. The BCT group showed favourable intervention effects for scores on determinants of screening when compared with baseline scores and BT. Conclusion: Although BCT did show favourable intervention effects for several determinants addressed in the intervention, we were not able to demonstrate the added value of BCT on screening uptake. Trial registration: The Netherlands National Trial Register NTR 2394. © The Author (2013). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
Author Keywords
Index Keywords
Link
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84911876910&doi=10.1093%2fheapro%2fdat020&partnerID=40&md5=b3ba4e2b24284154ac8ebed2ca09a43d
DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dat020
ISSN: 09574824
Cited by: 8
Original Language: English