Nephrology
Volume 23, Issue 12, 2018, Pages 1139-1144

Transplant tourism following the declaration of Istanbul: Poor outcomes and nephrologist dilemma (Article)

AlBugami M.M.* , AlOtaibe F.E. , Alabadi A.M. , Hamawi K. , Bel'eed-Akkari K.
  • a Multi-Organ Transplant Center, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Dammam, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
  • b Multi-Organ Transplant Center, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Dammam, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
  • c Multi-Organ Transplant Center, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
  • d Multi-Organ Transplant Center, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
  • e Multi-Organ Transplant Center, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Aim: Transplant tourism (TT) violates many international laws and documents. Despite all efforts, TT seems to be increasing. The aim of this study is to review outcomes of recipients of commercially transplanted kidneys since the Declaration of Istanbul. Methods: All recipients of kidney transplantation done abroad and then returning to our centre, from September 2008 to December 2015, were included (tourists). Demographics and outcomes were collected from patients’ charts. All data were compared with all recipients of living donor kidney transplants done at our centre (locals). Results: A total of 86 tourists and 365 locals were included. Both groups had similar age and gender. Re-grafting rates were the same, however, more pre-emptive transplants were done abroad. TT increased over time. Tourists presented early after TT, median 17.5 (IQR 7–30) days, and 47.7% were encountered initially in the emergency department. One-year graft and patient survivals were significantly lower among tourists compared with locals (87.2% vs. 98.0%, P < 0.001 and 90.7% vs. 98.0%, P < 0.001, respectively). Tourists had a significantly higher rate of acute cellular rejection (19.8% vs. 7.1%, P < 0.001), and they sustained significantly higher rates of serious viral, bacterial and fungal infections compared with the locals. Conclusion: Transplant tourism seems to be increasing despite international condemnation and efforts to stop it. Outcomes are significantly worse when compared to local transplant recipients. Concerted effort is needed to better inform patients about the ethical and physical harms related to TT, and to point them towards ethically sound and medically safer alternatives. © 2017 Asian Pacific Society of Nephrology

Author Keywords

acute rejection Patient survival Graft survival Transplant tourism Infection

Index Keywords

virus infection management living donor Living Donors urinary tract infection health care policy demography mycophenolate mofetil acute graft rejection follow up human risk assessment trends middle aged Turkey (republic) comparative study time factor Time Factors priority journal Prednisone bacteremia nephrologist patient safety Saudi Arabia graft rejection Humans Treatment Outcome graft survival male female risk factor Risk Factors creatinine blood level supply and distribution tacrolimus immunology Article legislation and jurisprudence Retrospective Studies policy making major clinical study emergency care adult graft recipient bacterial infection Kidney Transplantation medical tourism government regulation outcome assessment mycosis Health Policy surgical infection retrospective study cyclosporine graft versus host reaction basiliximab mortality creatinine thymocyte antibody

Link
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85057466803&doi=10.1111%2fnep.13181&partnerID=40&md5=1605f1c53b24e484724b8d16e66945da

DOI: 10.1111/nep.13181
ISSN: 13205358
Cited by: 2
Original Language: English