Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy
Volume 16, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 921-924
Kidney transplant tourism: Cases from Canada (Review)
Wright L.* ,
Zaltzman J.S. ,
Gill J. ,
Prasad G.V.R.
-
a
Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
-
b
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
-
c
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
-
d
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
Abstract
Canada has a marked shortfall between the supply and demand for kidneys for transplantation. Median wait times for deceased donor kidney transplantation vary from 5.8 years in British Columbia, 5.2 years in Manitoba and 4.5 years in Ontario to a little over 2 years in Quebec and Nova Scotia. Living donation provides a viable option for some, but not all people. Consequently, a small number of people travel abroad to undergo kidney transplantation by commercial means. The extent to which they are aware of the potential risks to their health and the health of the kidney vendors is unclear. Travel abroad to obtain a kidney commercially i.e. transplant tourism (TT), raises ethical issues which include the exploitation of the poor, uncertainty of donor informed consent to nephrectomy, poor clinical care and lack of follow up for the donor, commodification of the body and inequity of access to medical care for donors. Also, TT widens socioeconomic disparities in access to transplantation, differing from the Canadian system of universal coverage for healthcare. The Canadian transplant community has discussed how to respond to patients who plan to travel abroad for TT or return with a purchased kidney. Unease rests in the tension between the duty to care for legitimate Canadian residents and the unwillingness to enable TT. This paper discusses three anonymized cases and the Canadian responses to TT as recorded in academic literature and a formal statement by relevant professional bodies. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
Author Keywords
Index Keywords
Link
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84888132576&doi=10.1007%2fs11019-012-9450-4&partnerID=40&md5=8eb80b9d0985b18d9e269e8783a0ef25
DOI: 10.1007/s11019-012-9450-4
ISSN: 13867423
Cited by: 6
Original Language: English