Public Health
Volume 160, 2018, Pages 10-17

Effectiveness of occupational safety and health training for migrant farmworkers: a scoping review (Review)

Caffaro F.* , Micheletti Cremasco M. , Bagagiolo G. , Vigoroso L. , Cavallo E.
  • a Institute for Agricultural and Earthmoving Machines (IMAMOTER), Italian National Research Council (CNR), Strada delle Cacce, 73, Torino, 10135, Italy
  • b Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, via Accademia Albertina, 13, Torino, 10123, Italy
  • c Institute for Agricultural and Earthmoving Machines (IMAMOTER), Italian National Research Council (CNR), Strada delle Cacce, 73, Torino, 10135, Italy
  • d Institute for Agricultural and Earthmoving Machines (IMAMOTER), Italian National Research Council (CNR), Strada delle Cacce, 73, Torino, 10135, Italy
  • e Institute for Agricultural and Earthmoving Machines (IMAMOTER), Italian National Research Council (CNR), Strada delle Cacce, 73, Torino, 10135, Italy

Abstract

Objectives: Migrant farmworkers report higher rates of work-related illnesses, injuries and fatalities compared with local workers. Language and cultural barriers represent a relevant source of risk, which can be reduced by means of targeted training interventions. However, very little evidence is available about the effectiveness of Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) training programmes addressing migrant farmworkers. Study design: We carried out a scoping review. Methods: Currently available literature about the effectiveness of OSH training for migrant farmworkers—in terms of improvements in at least one of the following: safety knowledge, behaviours, attitudes and beliefs and health outcomes—was searched from four databases: PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus and Web of Science. The screening was performed independently by two authors, and any disagreement was resolved through discussion until consensus was achieved. Once the articles eligible for inclusion were selected, the objectives, design, sample and setting, interventions and findings of each study were recorded. No quality assessment tool for publications considered by this study has been used because a scoping review does not aim for critical appraisal. Results: Twenty-nine publications met the inclusion criteria. Of these, nine cross-sectional studies discussed the effectiveness of training activities in terms of whether participating in any programme had or did not have a significant effect on the dependent variables, when training was considered along with other sociodemographic factors. In the majority of these studies, training appeared to have low or no effect on the dependent variables considered. Twenty mainly within-subject experimental studies addressed the effectiveness of specific training methods, reporting significant improvements especially for interventions based on a participatory approach. Conclusions: Training could greatly contribute to an effective attainment of OSH information, but the present review shows that more evidence is needed to guide the future development of effective training activities. © 2018 The Royal Society for Public Health

Author Keywords

Migrants occupational health Training Agriculture Safety

Index Keywords

education publication training agricultural worker occupational disease human Occupational Diseases dependent variable Farmers Medline Cross-Sectional Studies occupational safety cross-sectional study migrant health impact psychology Humans occupational accident labor migration study design Occupational Injuries consensus experimental study safety PsycINFO agricultural labor Review Behavior Web of Science future prospect occupational exposure quality control medical information Scopus Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice database program evaluation migration human experiment occupational health Transients and Migrants mental capacity systematic review attitude to health

Link
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85046035539&doi=10.1016%2fj.puhe.2018.03.018&partnerID=40&md5=5d1aa63141ce1173cc46df7120fd5fef

DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2018.03.018
ISSN: 00333506
Cited by: 10
Original Language: English