Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences
Volume 32, Issue 2, 2018, Pages 698-706
Immigrants‘ use of health care in their country of origin: the role of social integration, discrimination and the parallel use of health care systems (Article)
Kemppainen L.* ,
Kemppainen T. ,
Skogberg N. ,
Kuusio H. ,
Koponen P.
-
a
Department of Social Research, Unit of Social Policy, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
-
b
Department of Social Research, Unit of Social Policy, University of Turku, Turku, Finland, Department of Social Research, Unit of Sociology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
-
c
Department of Welfare, National Institute for Health and Welfare, THL, Helsinki, Finland
-
d
Department of Welfare, National Institute for Health and Welfare, THL, Helsinki, Finland
-
e
Department of Public Health Solutions, National Institute for Health and Welfare, THL, Helsinki, Finland
Abstract
Aims: The objective of this study was to elucidate the utilisation of Russian health care by immigrants of Russian origin living in Finland (cross-border health care). The study examined the association of cross-border health care with social integration and discrimination. Moreover, it studied whether cross-border health care was used as an alternative to the host-country's healthcare system. Methods: Data from the Finnish Migrant Health and Wellbeing Survey (Maamu) were utilised. The number of respondents of Russian origin was 545. The main analytical method was logistic regression. The outcome variable was based on a survey item on seeking physician's treatment or help abroad during the last 12 months. Social integration was measured multi-dimensionally, and the indicator was extracted by multiple correspondence analysis. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Ethical Committee of the Uusimaa Hospital Region. Results: We found that 15.4% of the respondents had visited a physician in Russia during the last 12 months. 10.4% had experienced discrimination in Finnish health services during their stay in Finland. Stronger social integration predicted less frequent utilisation of cross-border health care. Experiences of discrimination or unfairness were associated with higher odds for seeking cross-border health care. Cross-border health care was typically used in parallel to the Finnish services. Conclusions: Our findings on integration and discrimination emphasise the importance of general integration policy as well as cultural competence in health care. Parallel use of healthcare systems entails both risks (e.g double medication, problems of follow-up) and opportunities (e.g. sense of agency), which should be further investigated. © 2017 Nordic College of Caring Science
Author Keywords
Index Keywords
Link
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85054142758&doi=10.1111%2fscs.12499&partnerID=40&md5=18ed891b354ea2dc4d89d1e49974b0b4
DOI: 10.1111/scs.12499
ISSN: 02839318
Cited by: 4
Original Language: English