BMC Health Services Research
Volume 18, Issue 1, 2018

Does multidisciplinary rehabilitation of tortured refugees represent 'value-for-money'? A follow-up of a Danish case-study (Article) (Open Access)

Bager L.* , Hansen K.S. , Andersen C.J. , Wang S.-J.S.
  • a Danish Institute Against Torture, Bryggervangen 55, Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark
  • b Department of Health Services Research, Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Oester Farimagsgade 5, Copenhagen, 1014, Denmark
  • c Decisionconsult A/S, Herluf Trolles Vej 243, Odense, 5220, Denmark
  • d Danish Institute Against Torture, Bryggervangen 55, Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark

Abstract

Background: The recent surge of asylum seekers in the European Union (EU) is raising questions about the EU's ability to integrate newcomers into the economy and into society; particularly those who need specialized services for the treatment of severe trauma. This study investigated whether rehabilitating traumatised refugees represents 'value-for-money' (VfM) in terms of intervention cost per health gain and in a long-term and societal perspective. Methods: The economic evaluation comprised a cost-utility analysis (CUA) and a partial cost-benefit analysis (CBA). The CUA incorporated data on Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY) for 45 patients who were treated at the Rehabilitation and Research Centre for Torture Victims, Copenhagen, Denmark, in 2001-2004 and followed for up to 2 years, to determine the incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER). For the CBA, data was collected for 44 patients who completed treatment between 2001 and 2004 and 44 matched controls on the waiting list, for the patients' primary health care utilisation, and personal and family labour income from 2001 to 2014. This was analysed to evaluate the Net Social Benefit (NSB) of the programme. Results: The average cost of treatment was found to be about 32,000 USD per patient (2016 prices) with an average gain in QALY of 0.82. The treatment was cost effective according to the ICER threshold suggested by the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (UK). At the individual level, the NSB remained negative throughout the study period. However, at the family income level the intervention proved to have been beneficial after 3 years. Conclusion: The implication of the study is, that providing rehabilitation to severely traumatised refugee families can be an economically viable strategy, considering the economic effects observed at the family level. © 2018 The Author(s).

Author Keywords

Health economics Resource allocation Cost-benefit Long-term follow-up War Quality of life Torture Cost-utility Multidisciplinary intervention

Index Keywords

patient care hospital admission refugee Cost benefit analysis economics Follow-Up Studies follow up human Refugees Denmark money resource allocation quality adjusted life year rehabilitation cost utility analysis national health organization Quality-Adjusted Life Years cost effectiveness analysis Humans psychology male female victim Article psychosocial rehabilitation adult major clinical study Psychiatric Rehabilitation family income cost-benefit analysis Patient Care Team primary health care Torture

Link
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85047138854&doi=10.1186%2fs12913-018-3145-3&partnerID=40&md5=58cc72da5ac201eee324554aec51a832

DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3145-3
ISSN: 14726963
Cited by: 1
Original Language: English